THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA WILL NO LONGER COLLECT MONEY FROM FAMILIES OF INCARCERATED JUVENILES
THE CIVIL RIGHTS PHARISEES OF CHARLOTTE - GENERATE A "NATIONAL PROTEST" FOR AWARENESS OF "BLACK PEOPLE CHOKED BY ASIAN STORE OWNERS"
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA HAS A PROBLEM WITH JUVENILE VIOLENCE - BUT "THE CIVIL RIGHTS PHARISEES OF THE DELAWARE VALLEY" ARGUE THAT "ASIAN IMMIGRANTS DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW THE LEGACY OF 'WHITE RIGHT WING RACISM' WHICH 'DESTROYED BLACK CULTURE', TODAY HAS ON BLACK PEOPLE STRUGGLING UNDER 'WHITE RIGHT WING ATTACKS' AND SOMETIMES THEY TAKE IT OUT ON PEOPLE APPEARING TO OPPRESS THEM
ANALYSIS - It Is Important To Not Cheapen This Story By Focusing On 'Low Hanging Bigotry'
It is clear that we are watching what others have warned us about: "NO DEMOCRACY CAN SURVIVE WITHOUT A BELIEF IN A HIGHER GOD".
The frustrating part of watching the first video about 'financial relief from punitive assessments against poor families" IS the ENLIGHTENED LEADERS (and the advocates) are made out to be SOCIAL JUSTICE HEROES.
The second video, however, shows that THE PROBLEM has not been addressed.
The very same people who like to point us to "The Costs" of removing 'the arts' from education (as they petition for more state funding) - are loathed to talk about how their choice to disassemble NON-GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS (ie: cultural institutions) within these same vulnerable communities is far, far, far more costly and does damage that will endure a life time AND will be replicated in the next generation.
"MAN MADE MONEY" VERSUS "GOD GIVEN VALUES"
OF COURSE when the question is framed as:
"Does this poor Black single mother with children have the resources to PAY THE FINE imposed by the city for the incarceration of her child for FIGHTING bring forth JUSTICE" - the answer is clear.
THE REAL QUESTION - unmolested by a malicious agenda is:
"SHOULD THIS ONE WOMAN BEAR THE LOAD IN ADDRESSING THE COMMUNITY AND SOCIETAL FAILURES THAT LEAD HER DOWN A CERTAIN PATHWAY, WHICH IS NOW BEING REPLICATED IN HER CHILD?"
What starts and stops at tired old debate about "Blaming The Victim" versus "Personal Responsibility" must be taken to the next step:
IN A COMMUNITY OF PEOPLE, in which ORDER is maintained in order to produce the PREDICTABILITY of favorable outcomes that is desired - WHAT 'RULES OF THE ROAD' must everyone submit to in order to avoid head on collisions when MASSIVELY DIFFERENT LIFE EXPERIENCES APPEAR TOGETHER ON THE SAME PAVEMENT?
These same politicians and activists who appeared in this video clip ALSO knocked on this woman's door during ELECTION SEASON - attempting to "Harvest Her Black Community Valuables".
At the same time, in the second scene - "THE ROOT.COM" AND 'THE GRIO" AND THE "NAACP" are NOT going to be photographed standing with the SMALL BUSINESS OWNER WHO WAS VIOLENTLY ATTACKED, apologizing to her for the actions of 'The Few.'.
Welcome to "The Game".
What expectation does the civilian who owns the store and has the right to maintain her business in a manner that maintains certain standards, so that her business will be seen as a safe and attractive location for her customers to come into and transact their desire for food in exchange for their money for these goods and services?
This business owner is expected to "Suck It Up".
When the shoe is on the other foot (the business owner attacks a 'Black woman" ) it becomes another justification for "#Black Lives Matter" to proclaim the worth of its own existence.