Monday, March 27, 2017

Sophia Nelson (I Appreciate You BUT) On The Matter Of Your Campaign About The "Offensive Black Male YouTube Videos": While Your TACTICS May Serve Your Purpose, The STRUCTURE Is Little Different From An Aggressive District Attorney Who Offers Nothing But 'THE LAW' To Regulate 'The Behavior Of Black Males'

I AM GOING TO SAY THIS UP FRONT AND THEN SAY IT AGAIN LATER ON JUST TO AFFIRM THE POINT

I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH YOU USING YOUR LEGAL TOOLS TO GO AFTER ANYONE WHO HAS PERSONALLY SLANDERED YOU ON SOCIAL MEDIA.

PLEASE REMOVE THESE MISCREANTS OFF OF THE STACK AS WE DELIBERATE ABOUT ALL OF THE OTHER 'BLACK MEN AND WOMEN' WHO ARE LEFT IN THE DOMAIN OF CONSIDERATION.

MY PROBLEM IS THAT YOU THEN PIVOT, USING THAT BASIS OF 'INDIVIDUAL SLANDER' TO TRANSITION INTO YOUR USE OF LEGALESE TO GO AFTER 'BLACK MALES WHO MAKE GENERALIZATIONS AGAINST BLACK WOMEN' BECAUSE YOU THEN SAY:  "BLACK WOMEN ARE DOUBLE MINORITIES AND DON'T NEED BLACK MALES BEATING THEM DOWN ON YOUTUBE'.

I can give you a long list of independently produced "Straight To DVD Movies" that I have watched over the years on NetFlix which - in my view - perfectly captures the 'Language Of Disrespect Between Black Males And Black Females' in "Ghetto Environments" which is PAR FOR THE COURSE to the point of being an 'English Dialect' rather than 'Offensive'.

In truth - it is the SCAR TISSUE that has been built up because the COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACT between 'Black Men and Black Women' has been torn up and degraded by the antics that SOME PEOPLE have been driving as 'Progressive'.   In truth  - they are squeezing one end of the balloon with their politics and activism - while ignoring the tumor that is being produced at the other end of the balloon and/or summarily dismissing it as 'Residue From Slavery'.

In short the DOMAIN OF 'IGNORANT SPEECH' ABOUT OR DIRECTLY TO BLACK WOMEN AND BLACK MEN IS FAR LARGER THAN A FEW SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS!!!

WE HAVE A "CULTURAL GOVERNANCE" / 'BLACK HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTION" INSTITUTIONAL PROBLEM.

The "Black Male / Female Division" that you speak of and the "I'm Helping To Uplift Black Women" meme that your friend has adopted do not speak to the VOID within which this MISCHIEF that you speak of is being conducted:

IN THE CONTAINER CALLED 'AMERICA' THE OVERRIDING 'VISION AND PURPOSE' THAT BLACK AMERICANS ARE PERPETUALLY INFORMED TO SUBMIT TO IS:

  • A STRUGGLE AGAINST THE REMNANTS OF 'WHITE SUPREMACY' AS MANIFEST THROUGH 'SLAVERY', 'JIM CROW' AND 'RIGHT WING PUBLIC POLICY'
  • THE ACTIVE CHANNELLING OF 'BLACK HOPES FOR DEVELOPMENT' THROUGH AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTIVISM - 'THE BLACK VOTE AND ACTIVIST PROTEST' BEING THE PRIMARY MEANS THROUGH WHICH ONE EXPRESSES THEIR 'BLACKNESS'
I do not believe that you acknowledge enough the pernicious effects of those who ENGINEER THIS NARRATIVE, repeat it in every 'Black Institution' so that it is made true and justified by mere repetition and popular sentiment.   

The key rebuttal that I am forced to ask you: IF this Black male disrespect of Black women is a relatively recent occurrence .....WHAT 'CONTRACT LANGUAGE' was changed in the definition of appropriate interactions between these codependent groups?  Might this have been a consequence of some ulterior motive that took our eye off of these intimate conversations? 








Dear Sophia Nelson:

Please list this as yet another post where "I DON'T UNDERSTAND YOU" and where I humbly ask that you clear up the major contradictions in your arguments.

I am going to tell you the STRUCTURAL miscalculations in your strategy now since this post is going to be revised several times as I float back and forth to my computer as I 'live my real life'.

The Contradiction Of Their Strategy That Sophia Nelson And Her "Offended Black Sistas" Must Fundamentally Address 

You keep mixing "Black Community Affairs" with "AMERICAN LEGALISMS" But Reserve The Right To DENY The Possession Of Any Of The "Institutional Coldness" Which Brought Forth MASS INCARCERATION That Was Produced When NON-BLACKS Used These Same INSTITUTIONS To Achieve Control.

I have NO PROBLEM with a Black person saying "I am 100% Americans and I have fought too long and too hard to deny my full spiritual commitment to my country and its institutions and culture".

I ONLY ASK that if this is indeed your sentiment you STOP making use of "RACIAL CARVE OUTS":   "Missing BLACK GIRLS In Washington DC", when your proper term should be "Missing American Girls".   This is only done to have it both ways.

I would like to introduce the construct of "OPPORTUNITY COSTS" as a means of placing a constraint upon both of our arguments.

This blog speaks of "BLACK COMMUNITY VALUABLES BEING INVESTED" as a necessary means of limiting the endless selling of "The Bridge In Selma" that we as Black Americans should be 'endlessly appreciative of", to the point of looking past OUR CONDITION after INVESTING in the strategy that Black leaders have lured 'American Containerized Blacks Into'.

THIS BLOG also tells of the need for them to "MOLEST BLACK COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY' so that:

  1. NO ANCIENT AFRICAN CULTURAL NORM.......IS ALLOWED TO SUPERCEDE TODAY'S PREVAILING 'BLACK' AMERICAN SENTIMENT
  2. NO 'BLACK CHRISTIAN CHURCH TRADITION'.....'THAT ALLOWED BLACK MEN AND BLACK WOMEN WHO WERE GOING TO BE LYNCHED TOGETHER' TO FUSE TOGETHER AND SURVIVE THE PHYSICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSAULT.....IS ALLOWED TO SUPERCEDE TODAY'S PREVAILING 'BLACK' AMERICAN SENTIMENT.
  3.  NO MODERN (POPULAR) BLACK 'MUSIC FORM', 'TELEVISION/MOVIE CONTENT', 'AMERICAN POLITICAL SPEECH' IS DEEMED 'OFFENSIVE' WHEN IT AVOIDS THE ERROR OF 'HATE SPEECH AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE' BUT IGNORES THE BIBLICAL COMMANDMENT: 'DO NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS AGAINST THY NEIGHBOR'
    • For this wise tenant was NOT done to protect the reputation of your 'Neighbor' or even 'Your Enemy'
    • This was done to prevent the PEOPLE WHO YOU CARE FOR to demand that a SOBER SET OF REAL WORLD TRUTHS be presented to them about FRIEND AND FOE so that with this EMPIRICAL INFORMATION they are equipped to make rational decisions using their mental faculties that 'God' bestowed upon them.
So I make the points above to you, Sophia Nelson, to say - What you are actively ramping up a strategic protest against has a POLLUTION SOURCE that is far upstream than the "YouTube Inlet" that you are focusing on.


WHEN COMMERCIAL BLACK IGNORANCE RECEIVES 'OFFICIAL SANCTION'
All Of The "Sambo / Samboette" Black Faced Reality Shows combined have a marketshare that puts the "Offensive Black Male YouTube Channels" to shame.

BUT the one thing that these YouTube Miscreants do not have is 'BLACK RACIAL SERVICES MACHINE OLIGARCHY' acceptance and co-branding.

I can tell you first hand that the "Samboette Reality Shows" targeted at Black women has altered the way that some Black women that I directly interface with engage in DEBATE and CONFLICT.

There is no bigger "Pot Calling The Kettle Black" example of the violation of:  "We already have outside forces seeking to divide Black people.  WHY are we allowing this internal force to help with this division?"

AGAIN:  GREATER THAN THE PROBLEM WITH "OFFENSIVE UNPOPULAR SPEECH"...................."AMERICAN CONTAINERIZED BLACKS" HAVE A PROBLEM WITH "POPULAR SPEECH AND ANTICS THAT ARE ACCEPTED BECAUSE IT ADVANCES THE ULERIOR MOTIVE OF THOSE WHO PROPAGATE IT"


This disrespect is CULTURAL AND INSTITUTIONAL at its root.
It was purposely done by foes - on the INSIDE and the OUTSIDE to ensure that in the resulting distention their GRAND HARVESTING SCHEME of our VALUABLES could go unmolested.

THE APPLICATION OF 'THE LAW' ALONE WILL PRODUCE THE EFFECTS OF 'SYSTEMATIC MASS INCARCERATION'

A good portion of the Black women that you seek to join your movement on this one issue are also actively involved in the "Mass Incarceration Movement".

There is a warehouse full of film footage by which - in this case WHITE people in power within the legal system used THE LAW to 'stick it to' the 'Unruly Negroes' as a means of keeping order and 'keeping them in their place', making them aware of the COSTS AND CONSEQUENCES of doing again what they had been previously warned about.

If you talked to those system operators at the time they could fully justify their actions and their use of 'the system' based upon a set of reasoning that DID NOT INCLUDE BLACK PEOPLE to offer a counterbalance.

I took your reference to 'Google's Legal Council' and applied it to another real world request of Google from Black people: "Give Our People A Shot At Employment - After Supplying A List To Make Google AWARE OF BLACK CANDIDATES".  The point is that GOOGLE and other corporations are not (and need not) be intimately familiar with the internal goings on between Black people and any related dysfunction.

BUT IT IS RELATIONAL that someone who just heard for the last 10 years a request to EMPLOY Black people (when the sentiment had been: "Few Are Qualified), to now hear "PLEASE BAN THESE OFFENSIVE BLACK MALES FROM YOUR PLATFORM" (after 15 years of hearing about 'The Digital Divide' - RACE BASED APARTHEID INTERNET ACCESS".

CLEARLY, one person watching over this 15 - 20 year span would conclude:  "There is SOMETHING going on between Black Americans which 'Produces Too Few Qualified Engineers And Too Many Offensive Content Creators".

This is NOT a request for you to adopt a 'Black Protection Racket', as I mentioned to you in my opening.
This IS a request that you shift your focus to the "CULTURAL /INSTITUTIONAL ROOTS" of the loss of "contractual standards of interactions" between people - by focusing on the COMMON LAYER upon which all who use YouTube or whom do not even have Internet access receive their 'rules of the road from'.

This is NOT from "Government".
This is NOT use "US Legal Code Books".

I assure you that if you shut these few down, a new crop will pop back up, your role being reduced into "Whack A Mole", after having failed to see the source.

This is in the realm of virtual space - in which 'A people' voluntarily agree to submit their individual instincts with the expectation that in this sacrifice some future gains will be made from the synergy and VERIFIED PURPOSE.



No comments: