Monday, March 27, 2017

Google "YouTube" Lowers The Barriers On What Is "Offensive Content", Begins To Ban Certain Content Contributors

THE CHANNEL THAT TALKS ABOUT 'BLACK WOMEN', BUT HAS ONLY 585 VIEWS - WHICH IS NO THREAT TO THOSE WHO ARE OFFENDED ON YOU TUBE
THE REAL "UNPROTECTED CLASS"


DEAR AFRICAN WOMEN AT THE BRINK OF DEATH IN MASSIVE REFUGEE CAMPS ON 'THE MOTHERLAND' : 
THE CONTAINERIZED BLACK AMERICANS ARE NOT COMING TO HELP YOU.

Now That The DIGITAL DIVIDE Is Easily Crossed By A HIGH SPEED INTERNET BRIDGE - They Have Splintered Into "Fighting Black Female And Black Male Factions" Battling Each Other On YOUTUBE.

YOU Do Not Have The "AMERICAN SLAVERY EXPERIENCE" To Warrant Their Attention As A Priority 





WHAT SPEECH SHOULD BE BANNED:
  1. Speech That Promotes Physical Violence Or An Attack Upon A Defined Group Of People
  2. Speech That Gives False Alarms, Causing 'First Responders' To Spend Money And Time That Is Taken Away From Real Emergencies
  3. Speech In Which A Content Contributor GOES OUT OF HIS BOX  Making Others Unable To Evade His Impressions (A Man With A Bullhorn Broadcasting 24/7 In Front Of Your House And Goes On Past Midnight With His Loud Public Disturbances)
SPEECH THAT SHOULD BE ALLOWED BUT IS ALSO SUBJECT TO CIVIL LAWSUIT
  1. Speech That Is Libelous 
  2. Speech That Systematically Slanders An "Individual Or Commercial Brand" (Reputation) With Proven Falsehoods

During My Tour Of Self-Indulgent YouTube Content Providers I Learned From "TheMindOfMarcus2" That "Oshay Duke Jackson" has had his content deleted from YouTube.



HATE BASED REVENUE - YOUTUBE SITES (In The Minds Of Those Who Use OFFENDEDNESS As A Weapon)


I have no way of affirming the claims from "The Mind Of Marcus" that it was the "Black Women" from "Lipstick Alley" who did the hit job against Oshay Duke Jackson.

For the record: O.D.J. is a "machine gun mouth slime thrower".   I only agree with a few of his arguments that "stick to the wall" and and align with my views.

The fact that he was always focused upon making a critical assessment of the "The Behavior Of Black Women" in their QUEST FOR POWER are NOT grounds for banning.  (Or have you not see the other 65% of YouTube that is pure B.S. and an attack upon people's time value?)





Notice how "MindOfMarcus" does NOT stand on the grounds of "FREE SPEECH" and "THE SLIPPER SLOPE OF 'OFFENDEDNESS' AS A STANDARD FOR CONTROLLING SPEECH.

Instead he focuses on THE PEOPLE (the combatants) involved and then makes a big laugh as he notes how HIS INCOME STREAM was not impacted when he was banned.

If there is ever the case of "IF YOU DON'T LIKE WHAT IS BEING SAID - TURN THE CHANNEL" it is THIS case.

With Google Search - one can find no less than 5 people countering every "ignorant" post that one finds offensive.


No comments: