Friday, December 23, 2016

CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK UNIVERSITY: THE DEBATE About "The Mississippi Black Church That Was Burned By A Black Man" MISSES THE POINT

The Associated Press article makes 3 classifications of responses
Source

BEFORE THE ARREST OF THE ARSONIST
  1. The BLACK MAYOR  who 'jumped to conclusions' by labeling it a HATE CRIME before any investigation took place
  2. The WHITE MAN in the article who voiced offense to the mayor's labeling it a possible HATE CRIME

AFTER THE ARREST OF THE ARSONIST
  1. WHITE PEOPLE on the Internet are saying "See" - this was not a HATE CRIME.  It was a Black man trying to exploit the sentiment against Trump in Progressive dominated communities
  2. BLACK PEOPLE on the Internet are saying "THIS BLACK MAN COULD NOT HAVE DONE THIS. Keep looking until you find a QUALIFIED WHITE MAN to pin this on"

THE MISSING OPTION:

(WHILE I OPPOSE 'HATE CRIME LAWS' AS 'FRAUDULENT THOUGHT CRIME LAWS' ) The FACT THAT THE MAN WHO
  •  SELECTED A SO CALLED "BLACK CHURCH"
  • BURNED IT DOWN
  • WROTE "VOTE TRUMP" UPON IT
WAS ALL DONE WITH THE SAME INTENT TO PROVOKE AND INTIMIDATE BLACK PEOPLE OF THIS COMMUNITY.

Why is it that THE FACT THAT THE MAN HIMSELF IS BLACK prevent him from being charged with a HATE CRIME?

Or, more to MY POINT - Why aren't the CIVIL RIGHTS PHARISEES calling for THIS BLACK MAN TO BE CHARGED WITH A HATE CRIME - when HIS INTENTIONS and THE OUTCOME was the same as if a (superior) WHITE MAN did it?

THIS AGAIN PROVES:  THE FRAUD OF "SOCIAL JUSTICE" AND THE FACT THAT THE "WHITE MAN IS ALWAYS WORTHY" for the American Containerized Negro to COMPROMISE their own integrity and logic.

No comments: