BEFORE THE ARREST OF THE ARSONIST
- The BLACK MAYOR who 'jumped to conclusions' by labeling it a HATE CRIME before any investigation took place
- The WHITE MAN in the article who voiced offense to the mayor's labeling it a possible HATE CRIME
AFTER THE ARREST OF THE ARSONIST
- WHITE PEOPLE on the Internet are saying "See" - this was not a HATE CRIME. It was a Black man trying to exploit the sentiment against Trump in Progressive dominated communities
- BLACK PEOPLE on the Internet are saying "THIS BLACK MAN COULD NOT HAVE DONE THIS. Keep looking until you find a QUALIFIED WHITE MAN to pin this on"
THE MISSING OPTION:
(WHILE I OPPOSE 'HATE CRIME LAWS' AS 'FRAUDULENT THOUGHT CRIME LAWS' ) The FACT THAT THE MAN WHO
- SELECTED A SO CALLED "BLACK CHURCH"
- BURNED IT DOWN
- WROTE "VOTE TRUMP" UPON IT
Why is it that THE FACT THAT THE MAN HIMSELF IS BLACK prevent him from being charged with a HATE CRIME?
Or, more to MY POINT - Why aren't the CIVIL RIGHTS PHARISEES calling for THIS BLACK MAN TO BE CHARGED WITH A HATE CRIME - when HIS INTENTIONS and THE OUTCOME was the same as if a (superior) WHITE MAN did it?
THIS AGAIN PROVES: THE FRAUD OF "SOCIAL JUSTICE" AND THE FACT THAT THE "WHITE MAN IS ALWAYS WORTHY" for the American Containerized Negro to COMPROMISE their own integrity and logic.