Sunday, May 29, 2016

Personal Diary - My Fruitful Engagement With The Offspring Of A "Faux Black Nationalist" / "Black Flight Progressive" WHO Represents The Next Generation Of Highly Educated By Youth BUT WHOM Can Articulate The POST-RACIAL PROGRESSIVE FUNDAMENTALIST TALKING POINTS That Are Torn Apart On This Blog As COLONIZATION NARRATIVES

I WANT TO START OFF BY PUTTING THIS AS MY STAKE IN THE GROUND.

MY VIEWS OF THE FRAUDULENT MOVEMENT KNOWN AS #BLACK LIVES MATTER AS A NECESSARY TOOL FOR "NON-VIOLENT COLONIZATION VIA OBFUSCATION" 
(The Systematic Molestation Of Governance Competences For The Colonized Americanized So-Called Negro)

MY CLARIFIED STANCE BASED UPON NOTED CONFUSION WHEN THIS CONSTRUCT IS SPOKEN TO PEOPLE WHO DON'T HAVE A BACKGROUND OF 'WHERE I AM COMING FROM', BASED UPON READING THIS BLOG

READ THE IRONY BETWEEN #2 AND #1 (Above) And Then Apply It To What I Am Watching In The Background:  "AMERICAN SOLDIERS IN AFGHANISTAN Noting Their "SUPERIOR Fire Power" Against The "Insurgents"

(#2 ) IF YOU CAN'T ENFORCE A 'GOVERNING COMPETENCY' WITHIN THE CIRCLE THAT YOU CALL (#1) 'YOUR COMMUNITY' THEN AN EXTERNAL GOVERNING FORCE WILL 'INVADE' YOUR ENCLOSED SPACE AND 'PUT DOWN THE 'INSURGENCY'


INTELLIGENT YET COLONIZED


I had the most fulfilling intellectual exchange with a new high school graduate.
I have not seen the daughter of one of my close friends in about 3 years.   I was astounded at how matured, articulate and polished that she had become.   After years of interacting with her and her siblings as young children I gave my friends high praise about what they had done for their daughter.

Though my friends are now divorced the father, my friend, still has a strong presence in the lives of his children.   If there is such a thing as the "Epitome Of How A Divorced Father Should Interact With His Children" - my friend would be that reference model.

He is - all at once :

  • The model of living apart but not "Departed"
  • AND "The Reason Why They Are No Longer A Family Unit"  (a detailed accounting is beyond the scope of this posting)
The relevant point, however, is that while both my male friend and his ex-wife are the second founding references for the term that I coined: "BLACK FLIGHT-PROGRESSIVES" (different from the ones that I commented about last weekend) - my friend is also a "Faux-Pan-Africanist".

While he points to how the current condition of "Blackness" in America (consumerism, lack of purpose - and in his greatest source of angst "The Worship Of The Slave-Master's Jesus") I now see that most of what he stands against in theory has fully engulfed his 4 children.


My Healthy Discussion With A High School Graduate

I did not have a conflict laced debate with my friend's daughter.
I did not try to "pull rank" on her, treating her as a child.
SHE WAS NOT a "Snotty Nosed Progressive Bigot" - who so frequently make use of POPULARISM to steam roll or mock any countervailing observations.

Instead - while I give her applause for her intellect and her ability to articulate her viewpoints - IT IS CLEAR THAT SHE HAS BEEN INDOCTRINATED BY A SOUNDING BOARD THAT HAS NOT BEEN STRUCTURALLY CHALLENGED (using the REAL WORLD rather than ASPIRATIONAL THEORY)


A few months ago my friend told me that his daughter attended a "Bernie Sanders Rally" and that she and her group of friends were strong supporters of him.  Despite being a self professed "Black Socialist" himself he said that he was opposed to both "Bernie Sanders" and "#Black Lives Matter".  (Bernie is a "Jew" and "#Black Lives Matter" does not comport with the real condition of Black people that he knows all too well from his own inner city experience as a youth).

I honestly do not remember how we got on the discussion about her "Feminism" as the daughter sat down on a back patio full of adults.

As I listened to her vocalization of her set of beliefs I heard the list of Progressive-Fundamentalist Talking Points that this blog is committed to exposing as conjured  up fraud:

She mentioned
  • MICRO-AGGRESSIONS
  • LGBTQ EQUALITY
  • HETERONORMATIVE
  • MARRIAGE EQUALITY
  • SOCIAL JUSTICE 
  • INEQUALITY
  • #BLACK LIVES MATTER

To be clear - I WOULD RATHER ENGAGE WITH A YOUNG PERSON WHO IS SMART, IS ABLE TO ARTICULATE THEIR VIEWPOINT AND IS HUMBLE AND OPEN MINDED IN LISTENING TO CHALLENGES.

I DID NOT work to CONFOUND HER VIEWS.
I only listened, noted how most of them were "VAPING SMOKE" and my counterpoints were all based upon my "INVESTMENT AND RETURNS" meme.

#1 Frustration Were The OTHER ADULTS who kept interrupting our conversation with their extraneous comments.    While I believe that the high school graduate and me fully understood each other - the OTHER PEOPLE LISTENING IN effectively derailed an other wise excellent conversation of ideas because THEY DIDN'T 'GET IT'.  


Brilliant But Colonized  Constructive Feedback University
Heteronormative  "I stand for LGBTQ Full Equality"

(What does that mean?)
"I believe that any LGBTQ person should have a right to love who they choose without SOCIETY discriminating against them BECAUSE this SYSTEM that we live in is HETERO-NORMATIVE"

"WHO ARE YOU ULTIMATELY FIGHTING AGAINST?   As I listen to feminists they almost always are fighting against 'White European Male Patriarchy'.

"Why do you talk in terms of THIS SYSTEM and its manifestation in the UNITED STATES?

If we look at the ENTIRE WORLD - all humans and all MAMMALS - it is not "THE SYSTEM" that is discriminatory with its HETERONORMATIVITY.

It is THE PHYSIOLOGICAL BODY FORMS OF MALE AND FEMALE IN EVERY SPECIES THAT IS "HETERONORMATIVE" per our complentary genitalia!!

Are you sure that your FIGHT is anything more than someone's attempt to get you to channel your obvious intelligence into their cause?"

Abortion (I noted that in terms of American politics I AM PROCHOICE because I do not believe that the government should be invovled in this intimate matter BUT I AS A CULTURAL STRATEGIST - mandate that A PEOPLE create the conditions by which their FRUIT is optomized to form the foundation of their prosperous future).

[Note: My communents to the right came before her comments below]

"I believe that these Black women in New York that you speak of are exhibiting control over their own bodies and that we have a duty to respect their choices over their own bodies"
"So let me ask you.  While I am technically pro-choice I noticed the other day that in New York City there are more Black women who abort their children than bring them to term.

WHAT IF, in the process of a Black woman expressing her right to control her body and reproductive choices that THE MACHINE that I told you about before who desires to limit your popualtion keep these women focused on THEIR RIGHTS but purposely limit their analysis of THE BIG PICTURE that is happening?

Does it bother you that they will make use of Black people's aggregate statistics as a pretext of limiting what they STAND AGAINST as Progressive Activists, while they yield such commentary about unanticipated consequences from the other matters that they advocate for?

AGAIN - what do you do to ensure that this body of thought that wants as an activist are not, in fact, stringing you along?

#Black Lives Matter NOTE: The graphic at the top that I just created was directly motivated by her questions of my arguments.   When she asked me:  "So are you saying that BLACK PEOPLE SHOULD FIRST STOP KILLING EACH OTHER BEFORE WE SHOULD ASK THE POLICE TO STOP KILLING US?"

I TOLD HER "NO".

"The police interactions with Black people AND the over-representation of Black Americans in the national homicide count are products of MY POINT:  'If a people can't systematically correlate the prevailing culture of their own people with a larger PRODUCTIVE PURPOSE that them as indiviuals plut into THEN YOU SHOULD NOT BE SURPRISED to see both the yin and yang results (Police killings and Black On Black Killings) AND the focus on THE DEBATE rather than THE GOVERNANCE to provide redress."


GENDER PAY INEQUALITY/ CLASS INEQUALITY  [Again - Read the cell to the right because my comments came first]


"As I listen to you - most of your comments are Progressive commentary.  I notice that when progressives are given two - theoretically mutually exclusive points that you will try to choose BOTH.

FOR EXAMPLE.   The two costars of 'The X-Files remake are male and female.  The male got more pay than the female star.  She complained and got an equal salary.

MY POINT: Since both of them together are making something like $20 million in aggregate - AND ARE FIRMLY IN THE "1%" - as a feminist who is fighting the gender pay gap how do you reconsile that you are "SUPPORTING A WOMAN ON HER PLIGHT FOR EQUAL MILLIONAIRE PAY" - yet when she comes along as an activist against "CLASS INEQUALITY" - instead of banishing her or Susan Surandon - as "THE 1%" - you all welcome their activist voices because they are AGREEING WITH WHAT YOU AGREE WITH.

How do you reconcile this clear contradiction? 
Table Cell Table Cell Table Cell

No comments: