Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Dear Rev Tony Evans: I DISAGREE WITH YOU!! Progressive Fundamentalist Melissa Harris-Perry DID Bring The Voices Of "The Black Church" On Her Show As Important Social Issues Were Being Discussed. It Is Just That "Rev William Barber" Is A Different Sect Of Your "Black Political Christian Church". THERE IS NO "BLACK CHRISTIANITY" ONLY A POLITICAL MOLESTATION OF THE WILL OF GOD

THE RIGHT POLITICAL WING OF THE "BLACK POLITICAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH"

Rev Tony Evans' Claim:  Melissa Harris Perry Did Not Give "The Black Church" A Spot On Her Show As She Debated Important Social Issues



THE LEFT WING OF THE "BLACK POLITICAL CHRISTIAN CHURCH"



Table Cell




NEGRO PLEASE!!!!!!
THE RISE OF THE FAKE EXE-JESUS OF SOCIAL JUSTICE - USING CHRISTIAN CHURCH SCAFFOLDING 




CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK UNIVERSITY - THE MEASURE OF A CONSTRUCT AS A PLATFORM FOR DIVERSE THOUGHTS

Please accept this as my first pass on a concept that I was thinking about during a recent trip.

In the context of the perpetual demand for UNITY in one domain in order to express ADVANCEMENT, how much integrity does this one domain express in support of differences of opinions?


In the above example the point is that while we often hear calls for UNITY on matters of:

  • Race ("If Black People Could Only Unify As A People We Would Be Unstopable")
  • Religion ("We All Worship One God")
  • Class ("Unite To Help The Least Of These Among Us"
  • and POLITICS 
ONLY POLITICS shows evidence of being the OMNIBUS platform that can cause people to submit their Racial/Religious and Class-based interests in support for POWER IN GOVERNMENT.

THE POINT IS:  THE ONE CONTAINER OF 'PERMANENT INTERESTS' THAT PEOPLE ARE ASKED TO UNITE AROUND IS OFTEN NOT THE REAL AGENDA THAT THEY ARE INTERESTED IN ADVANCING 

In my next revision of this idea I will add "Geography" (outside of America) in order to determine, for example if the drive for "Global Christianity", "Poor People Of The World Unite" or "The Black Global Diaspora" are worthy platforms that can retain its containerized integrity (without compromising itself for advantage in a different container)

No comments: