ANALYSIS - SALLY KOHN IS DISHONEST IN HER ANALYSIS
Sally Kohn wrote a preemptive article, attempting to take the sting out of what she KNEW SHE WAS GOING TO SEE in a few days: NATIONWIDE VIOLENCE in reaction to the grand jury's findings in "Ferguson".
She understood that in order to take the wind out of the sails of WHITE RIGHT-WING CONDEMNATION and the calls for LAW AND ORDER in America - she had to show WHITE FOLKS EXACTING VIOLENT PROTESTS. From this "moral ledge" she can ask her WHITE RIGHT-WING WOLF enemies:
"WHY DIDN'T YOU CONDEMN THESE VIOLENT WHITE PEOPLE WHEN THEY DID THE SAME THING? You must be a RACIST in your calls for JUSTICE".
The flaw in Sally Kohn's analysis about "Why Didn't You Condemn Them When WHITE PEOPLE Protested" is that she uses the slight of hand by focusing on RACE in order to make what is ultimately an IDEOLOGICAL point.
OF COURSE White Right Wing operatives like "Bill O'Reilly" and "Sean Hannity" and "Michael Medved" condemn VIOLENT WHITE PROTESTS - example "after a SPORTS VICTORY on a college campus".
The point to understand is that they attack this violence as LEFTIST VIOLENCE. The "young (White) leftists on college campuses with a sense of (progressive) entitlement have no respect for law and order" - they would say.
Sally Kohn is forced to misrepresent this fact by attempting to kept her argument focused strictly on RACE.
Of course - these destructive protests done by "young White progressives" do not enjoy a multi-day news cycle coverage. They flair up right after the championship victory and this dissipate the day after.
We should take a look at the AUSTERITY PROTESTS that were happening in "England", "Italy" and "Spain" a few years ago - lead by young White Progressives who did not want their tuition raised (UK) and conducted violent protests in response. These too were covered from an IDEOLOGICAL indictment by the White Conservative operatives in America.
Note the comments made by Black radio operatives on the violence that is happening around the national "Ferguson protests". While these are clearly lead by "Progressive Fundamentalist" and are mostly Black - they specifically point to WHITE PEOPLE WEARING 'ANONYMOUS MASKS' - THE ANARCHISTS that have infiltrated an otherwise "Peaceful Movement" as the trouble makers.
Once again you have a diversion toward the secondary "axis" in the name of "self-protection" of the narrators cause. Thus the "Black radio host" who is the voice of the "Black Progressive" drive for "justice" - is pointing the finger at the WHITE FOLKS (while withholding their IDEOLOGICAL membership) as the source of the violence.
THE TEA PARTY - THE SUPERIORITY OF THE WHITE THOUGHTS AND INTENTIONS
Today I heard Black talk radio hosts mentioning how "The News Media" sought to slander an otherwise peaceful "Protest For Justice" by highlighting the violence.
I AGREE THAT THE MAJORITY OF PROTESTS IN THE LARGEST RALLIES AROUND THE NATION WERE PEACEFUL.
There were factions of violent people AND some cities that were characterized by people with violent intent over all else (See Oakland).
As I listened to these voices on the "Black Wing Grievance & Political Opportunism Talk Radio" I heard arguments that sounded remarkably similar to what the WHITE RIGHT WING RADIO HOSTS were saying during the "Tea Party Rallies":
"The ideological enemy is slandering us by focusing upon THE VIOLENT/IGNORANT elements in our protests so they don't have to address the key elements of our message that the large peaceful continent is presenting on the public square."
(I record a balance of "Black Talk Radio" and "White Right-Wing" talk radio in order to understand their respective tricks of the trade. Both are ultimately dishonest based on their emphasis and "narrative". I watch "Democracy Now", "Tom Hartman" "Al Jezeera America" and select programs on "Free Speech TV" in order to hear "White Progressive" viewpoints. "Larry Elder" and "Pastor Levi Yuel "/"Joshua's Trail" are my representative "Black Conservative" source of information. ).
When it came to the "Tea Party" the indictment was not in the BURNING BUILDINGS that they left behind (they didn't leave any) but the RACIST INTENT of their gathering.
The fact that a largely homogeneous group of WHITE FOLKS gathered during the time where a "Black President" was in power - afforded those who practice "Keep The Enemy On Trial So We Don't Have To Indict Our Friends" to force their enemy to PROVE THAT THEY WERE NOT RACIST in their protestations.
Were some of the Tea Party protesters RACIST? NO DOUBT.
It was the RIGHT-WING drive against Obama's PROGRESSIVE FUNDAMENTALISM that was the greater precipitating force - in my view.
The same people who wish to impugn the RACIST intent of the "Tea Party" have never brought up the SILENCE among "The Americanized Negro" and the "Post-Racial Progressive Fundamentalist Alliance" in response to OBAMA'S USE OF AMERICAN IMPERIALISM to run a "Coup In Africa" and when he rained drone bombs into various "Nations Of Color".
The VERY SAME SPIRIT that is motivating the "Tea Party" to stay silence with "Bush's Budget Busting Deficits" is the equal opportunity spirit that keeps the Progressives silent about Obama's War Making and Domestic Surveillance, which they would have excoriated the Republican enemy had he done the same.
- THE STEREOTYPE OF BLACK PEOPLE IS THAT WE ARE VIOLENT WHEN WE CONGREGATE
- THE STEREOTYPE OF THE WHITE RIGHT WING IS THAT THEY ARE RACIST WHEN THEY CONGREGATE
Notice that I had to qualify the WHITE axis into "Right Wing" and "Left Wing" (which was left unspoken. I am also sure that you noticed the "?" on the grid when seeking a "Black Right Wing-lead" protest movement.
"The Nation Of Islam", for example - might be considered "Right-wing" with regard to their religious dogmatism. They are Progressive Fundamentalist and even "Non-White White Supremacist" when I analyze their views in reference to "American National Politics". The "Black Right-Wing" does not fit easily into its own category. It is typically appended upon the other "racial" or "ideological movement".
(NOTE: I consider myself a "Black Cultural Conservative" and not a "Black Political Conservative". I have no affiliation with the Republican Party and believe that they are equal thieves of consciousness as are the Democrats. I stand against single party rule at the national level and, despite my "right of center" vantage point - I will vote for a liberal Democrat IF it would block a right-wing take over of all of the branches of the federal government.

A "Black Republican" seeks to have Black people join his team and deemphasize "Black community institutional governance" - just as his Black Democratic adversary wishes for.)
(Back to the section title)
SUPERIOR to the "Violence And Looting" of the Left-Wing is the perceived INSTITUTIONAL WHITE SUPREMACY that "The White Right Wing" Represents.
When Glenn Beck held his "Restoring Honor" event in Washington DC it was maligned as a RACIST event because of its intent to COUNTER PROGRESSIVISM.
Despite the fact that the Progressive media warned that thousands of WHITE FOLKS converging to the "Chocolate City" of Washington DC - and at least on one occasion - a "Tea Party" event being held concurrently with the "Black Family Cookout" - the warnings of violent White attacks on Black people did not pan out.
(Note: I assure you that if there was similar fear riled up in the ranks of White people upon the mass gathering of Black people- when I attended the "Million Man March" back in 1996(?). This was the most peaceful mass gathering that I have ever attended.)
The ultimate point of this entire posting is to note that while it is true that BOTH SIDES (Left and Right) use slander to impugn "the enemy" - the force of "NON-WHITE WHITE SUPREMACY" (the assumptions of "White Supremacy" held by Black people) is a unique attribute in its impact upon "Black psyche".
In as much as it is true that the "Americanized Negro" is being indoctrinated upon "Progressive Colonialism" (and yes I believe this as the facts make this clear) - the use of RACISM CHASING to affect a PROGRESSIVE AGENDA - is rather scurrilous.