Sunday, March 03, 2013

Rob Redding Your Guest DOES NOT MAKE SENSE On The Sequester

Rob Redding - Take A Step Back From Your "Sequester Guest" that you have on your show right now.  (9:30pm Sunday).

This guy (Wade Simmons - Editor At Large) and YOU just said "The Blacks will be greatly impacted by the job cuts - up to 6% points.    Black people are disproportionately GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES and thus if the government cuts jobs - there goes "Black Jobs".

He then said that the failure to "pay our bills" will make the US credit debt get dinged by the 3 Credit Ratings agencies - one of which already hit the USA during last year's debt ceiling fight.

As the interest rates rise because of the lowered rating - the USA will have to pay higher interest rates to service its debt.   This debt (he said) will then be passed on to our children.

This is going to be a nightmare - Black unemployment rates up to 24% (IIRC) he said.



Rob Redding - WHY Would You And Wade Simmons Latch THE BLACK "ECONOMY" Onto The $16.5 Trillion IN DEBT American Economy IF YOU KNOW Where All Of This Is Heading?


Rob Redding here is where I violently disagree with you.

When you are presented certain arguments - instead of being able to think BEYOND the "American Political Domain" your OWN domain and range is seen to be what you talk about everyday POLITICS.

It doesn't matter about PARTY MEMBERSHIP.   The fact is that you are only a political creature.

I struggle to understand how - with EVERYONE talking about a "Mid-Term Threat" of debt and, most assuredly a "Long Term Fiscal Threat" - WHY ARE WE TALKING ABOUT "BLACK PEOPLE AND GOVERNMENT JOBS"?

Do you think that any federal employees are going to make it out of the hole whenever someone assigned a DATE to the "Mid-Term Threat" than if we get past this Sequestration?

Why would anyone base so much of "their people's EMPLOYMENT and WHEREWITHAL upon an organization that is based on FIAT / FUNNY MONEY?

It is clear that the "Optics" that keep this going is also failing to DEVELOP OUR PEOPLE - our "Human Resource Development Institutions" - sufficiently doing what they are prescribed to do - so that our EXPOSURE to these POLITICALLY FUNDED JOBS are kept ONLY to the amount of hard currency that is GENERATED BY THE ECONOMY rather than by the Federal Reserve.

Where is your ability to RECOMMEND LIMITATIONS OF EXPOSURE rather than "Occupation Rights"?

Bottom Line That You Need To Answer Rob:

As The Black Racial Services Machine record more political victories WHY aren't we seeing a closure in the GAP between "Black Unemployment" and "The National Unemployment Rate"  IF RACISM is the MOST SIGNIFICANT force that is causing this gap?

Clarification:
Listen to the average Black Progressive journalist, Civil Rights Pharisee, public intellectual or political operative and - if you don't get the story of the "White male with a criminal record and the Black guy with the college degree go looking for a job" then you will hear the generalized claim that Black people go to government jobs because the private sector has RACIST HIRING PRACTICES.

For people who think like this they have no intention to document the "Force Amplitude" that RACISM has - in relation to other forces.   The fact that they find RACISM at "10 parts per billion" is SUPERIOR enough for them to suppress any further assumption that "The Black Community Is NOT Getting A RETURN ON ITS VALUABLES Invested Into Politics And 'The Black Progressive Struggle'.

Unfortunately, Rob, IF your job is that of an "aeronautical engineer" and YOUR REAL AGENDA is to build a plane that can FLY and not just a Super Jumbo Jet that remains land based by has the best cabin service that "Pleases All Negroes Who Come Aboard" then it is incumbent upon you to MAKE A TRANSPARENT MEASURE of all of the FORCES THAT BEAR DOWN UPON THAT CRAFT.

If you see a POPULAR design that has a near universal blessing and gets all "Thumbs Up" except from you because you see that they didn't factor in the CROSSWINDS - in YOUR SILENCE as the plane takes off down the runway but the crosswinds force that you stayed silent about because you wanted to "Get In Where You Fit In" and NOT upset the POPULOUS - causes the plane to topple over and everyone perishes - WHO do you think if culpable beyond the "Yes Men" who saw POPULARITY as EFFECTIVE DESIGN?


NOTHING IS GOING TO CHANGE UNTIL THE BASIC SET OF ASSUMPTIONS DEPLOYED BY THE "AMERICANIZED BLACK CONSUMER" CHANGES.  

SOME PEOPLE DON'T MIND USING THEMSELVES BECAUSE AT LEAST IT PRODUCES THE DESIRED "CONGREGATIONAL EFFECTS", ALLOWING THEM TO SHARE THE WARMTH OF THE BODIES STANDING NEXT TO THEM AS THEY CLAIM THEY "HEATED THE ROOM" WITH A "GREEN" HVAC SYSTEM. 


No comments: