Monday, February 25, 2013

Irey The Liberal Lion: Guns Vs Blocks Of Government Cheese


For the life of me I do not understand how some of "Ya'll" THINK.
Otherwise intelligent Black people, so buffered by the company that they keep that they can't see the logical leaps that they make in their arguments that ONLY a "fellow traveler" will not bother to call them out because of the fact that it represents the piece of threat - if pulled - would cause the entirety of the fabric that they have cloaked upon the Black community's head to unravel, showing them for who they are.


Here is my friend "Irey The Liberal Lion's" Rebuttal To Black Republican Star Parker's Support For Gun Ownership
Ms. Parker - "According to a recent Pew Research Center survey, 42 percent of whites and 16 percent of blacks say that they have a pistol or rifle at home. And,
according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, for the period 1980 to 2008,
'Blacks were six times more likely than whites to be homicide victims and eight times more likely to commit a homicide.'"
Let me see if I have this right, about 2/3 fewer of the black population
(per capita) have a pistol or rifle at HOME than the white population, but are
six times more likely than whites to be victims of homicide (outside the
home?), principally by gun, and are six times more likely than whites to commit
homicide, principally by gun. If this is the case, why would whites or especially blacks, want more firearms in the black community? Ms. Parker can be counted on to sing the party line a cappella with ideologically submissive Pavlovian detachment from the cerebrum. How do her statistics lend credence to her hypothesis that “gun rights preserve black lives”? When and where in American history have more weapons enhanced the survival prospects for blacks? And don’t any romantically misinformed youngsters recount the chapter where the valiant Black Panthers armed to protect their neighborhoods. Read to the end of that chapter and you will find they were gun-downed and slaughtered – because they were armed!
There are those of Generations X, Y, or Z whose sensibilities will be
assaulted by what they will condemn as some anachronistic hysteresis
when I say there has been and remains a “white reality” and a “black
reality”. I know it is impolitic to say such a thing, but Ms. Parker
and other black conservatives, regularly reinforce my conclusion,
unbeknownth to them, with their own statements and statistics. For
example, when in American history, not including slavery, during any
era, under any political regime, under any sized government, regardless
which political party the bulk of black voter preferred, recession,
depression, boom, or bust when the percentage of black unemployment
did not exceed the percentage of white unemployment? Contemporary
ideologues may point out the deficiencies of “black leadership”, or
liberal policies, or whatever. But there hasn’t always been black
political leadership, and there must have been a time when liberal
policies didn’t hold sway, or there would be no time, place, or policy
regime for conservatives to “return” to. Yet, black unemployment has
always exceeded white unemployment. Creative persons can cogitate
earnestly and probably come up with paragraphs of sociological,
political, economic, psychological, or as some have speculated, even
genetic reasons to explain this ethnography. But regardless the validity
or error of those reasons, they will not debase my observation that
socioeconomically, particularly as involves employment, by way of
Cartesian logic it is not unfounded to conclude there is a historical
and continuing “black reality” and a “white reality”.
I contend there is a similar divergence when contemplating the
supposed virtues of the Second Amendment. If white Americans can
celebrate the benefits and protections they owe principally and
primarily to the Second Amendment, I don’t see how a similar celebration
can logically or realistically be fomented in the black community. The
Second Amendment has generally been alternately a blugeon, threat, or a
blight on black America, and is currently the host agent of a violent
(and encouraged?) genocidal plague. Ms. Parker’s own statistics on their
own, even as they forsake historical context, amply demonstrate that
gun right don’t, haven’t, and I insist, are not now preserving black lives. I simply find it astounding that the sycophantic black conservative precariat will deny historic reality to burnish any fallacy and inconsistency in the American myth –even to their own physical and intellectual detriment.



With A Tear In My Mind's Eye As I Read Irey's Arguments And Apply Them To The Real World - I Offer The Following Rebuttal

The "Blax News" posts were created as a coping mechanism for me.  When I read blogs and news reports from people who think just like Irey - the metaphor for the "Philly Beat Down" that would have brought some sense to Irey had he received one - is channeled into sarcastic comic relief which won't get me locked up.

I am going to address all of Irey's salient points - NOT with a "transactional rebuttal" but one that more fully encompasses the larger picture that he misses.  And then in the other column I am going to channel my violence into "Blax News".


Irey The Liberal Lion  Constructive Feedback University - "The BIG PICTURE"  Blax News
- Vilence Redirection


Let me see if I have this right, about 2/3 fewer of the black population (per capita) have a pistol or rifle at HOME than the white population, but are six times more likely than whites to be victims of homicide (outside the home?),

Irey is basically doing what I see so many of the people who think like him do:  STRIP THE HUMANITY away from the BLACK ASSAILANT - casting him as a VICTIM of TOO MANY GUNS AROUND that gave him more efficient deadly options through which he is now incarcerated.

It is common within the "Americanized Black Discourse" to hear tales of how "The Blacks have 'the worst' of all of the ailments' and the least of all of the good outcomes".

If you pay careful attention to Irey's argument - with TWO OPTIONS ON THE TABLE:

  • The Superior Quantity Of Guns Held By The White Man
  • The More Numerous Black Homicides ............
Irey CAREFULLY SELECTED "The Homicide Issue".

Recall that I told you that a "Black Progressive Fundamental' doesn't mind arguing based on the assumption of BLACK INFERIORITY.....as long as it is done in the context of a closed loop transaction?   

Well in the case of Irey - he doesn't mind implicitly arguing that "The Negro Is More Violent" as his community is seeded with guns than is the White man.  He knows that his fellow souls will agree among themselves that this VIOLENCE is the residue of centuries of oppression - and NOT any failure among their part to block certain damaging baggage from seeping into the consciousness of a new generation of Black people - attesting to his competence at inculcating our children - in preparation for the next interval of our societal existence.

None of Irey's friends with think to "GO THERE" with him so the truth about the subtext of their common assumptions will never be debated.


Had Irey leaded on his WHITE ALLIES to reduce their gun ownership even more so that the "6 times" RATIO OF White to Black Homicide would go to 10 TIMES - I would have had more respect for him.

Not even SBPDL would be able to better document the notion that "THE NEGRO IS MORE VIOLENT THAN 'THE WHITE'".

The only difference between Irey and SBPDL - is that SBPDL would actually SAY IT - thus upsetting "The Blacks".



Meet "The Ratio Increase Agent"

 If this is the case, why would whites or especially blacks, want more firearms in the black community? Ms. Parker can be counted on to sing the party line a cappella with ideologically submissive Pavlovian detachment from the cerebrum You all missed depth of this one.

Irey said "WANT".


He must debate on "WANT" because "THE EXPRESSION OF THEIR RIGHTS" would cause him to yield that many of the other RIGHTS that he argues that "Evil Men" VIOLATE a part of the "Good Constitutional elements" that he stands for.  "Gun Rights" are outdated as colonial times, militias and slavery.

He understands that if the RIGHT to gun ownership is left unchallenged (even if we arrest the debate about assault rifles and clip sizes) then - per his way of thinking - MORE BLACK PEOPLE WITH GUNS means MORE NEGROES ARE GOING TO GET SHOT.  A simple case of mathematics.


Even though Irey does his fair share of towing the party line himself - he indicts Start Parker as a parrot - for no other reason than he knows that Black people prefer the species of talking birds that Irey himself is.

But Star Parker doesn't have a escrow account full of the American Negro's valuables.  These given to her based upon the promise that a quid pro quo of community safety, education and productivity would be secured upon the check clearing the bank.

Irey craftily understands that IF he makes this struggle a political struggle over GUN CONTROL - that most Black people will join in - fighting AGAINST the RIGHT WING - knowing that the incompetence of the Black Racial Services Machine to instill a greater CONSCIOUSNESS and PURPOSE into these young people - is the contamination that is deposited within the "head waters" - which leads to the river of pollution down stream.

The classic rebuttal that they use says: "Your RIGHTS to a gun - unlike my RIGHT to 'free speech', 'voting' and abortion' does not KILL ANYONE - Without the CHOICE to do so.  We Defend 'The War On Women' Without Using Firearms.  "

I would challenge Irey to PUT HIS VALUES WHERE HIS MOUTH IS and agree to the new clause that says:

"ANY BLACK PERSON WHO COMMITS A MURDER OR VIOLENT ACT - CAN ONLY VOTE FOR REPUBLICANS from here on out", automatic voter registration upon release from prison - as the primary deterrent for Black people who HAVE LOST THEIR RESPECT FOR THEIR COMMUNITY at the street level - can express this contempt in the VOTING BOOTH.

It is our opinion - however, that THIS CLAUSE would trigger the greatest CONFLICT RESOLUTION TRAINING PROGRAM - FOR FREE- that the Black community has ever seen.


"Republicans Are The New Black - If You Shoot Someone"

How do her statistics lend credence to her hypothesis that “gun rights preserve black lives”? When and where in American history have more weapons enhanced the survival prospects for blacks? And don’t any romantically misinformed youngsters recount the chapter where the valiant Black Panthers armed to protect their neighborhoods. Read to the end of that chapter and you will find they were gun-downed and slaughtered – because they were armed! I AGREE WITH IREY ON THIS ONE!!!

Star Parker, Niger Innis, Project 21, OTHERS make a tactical flaw by trying to SELL this issue using the various sweetners that they do.

This is NOT about "Gun Control"
This is NOT about dredging up the RACIST HISTORY of "Gun Control".

THE REAL ISSUE that Irey, Michel Martin and so many other Black Progressives DO NOT want to talk about is:

The CONSCIOUS LOYALTIES that are allowed to foment within the Black Community.

The rhetoric heard on "Black Wing Grievance & Political Opportunism Talk Radio" which says "THEY Are Not Going To Get Comfortable Thinking That They Can Just Shoot A Black Person Dead On The Streets Like A DOG And Rest Comfortably Thinking That The Black Community Is Going To Remain Silent And Obedient In Response".

This type of "Huff And Puff" gives the image of ABSOLUTE VALUE OF BLACK LIFE and a will for those on the front lines to fight to respect it.

We only need to play with the variable "THEY" to see that when "THEY" is a  White person or a Police man then it is a crowd pleaser.

When "THEY" is a young man who's consciousness was incubated via the messages that were received from a "Hip Hop Voice Of The Street Pirate" radio station that is owned by the same parent company - they tend to instead insert "The NRA and the Right Wing" because they don't like stepping on their own ingrown toenail and suffer self-inflicted pain.



While Irey disparages the "Romantic History" of the (real) Black Panthers - he won't admit that he was disappointed that "Django Unchained" failed to get a "Best Movie Oscar" last night.

In this very same Chicago neighborhood where Fred Hampton was murdered - many Black people are murdered each and every year but few of them rise to martyr status.  They were killed by a person who was not worthy.





There are those of Generations X, Y, or Z whose sensibilities will be
assaulted by what they will condemn as some anachronistic hysteresis 
when I say there has been and remains a “white reality” and a “black 
reality”. I know it is impolitic to say such a thing, but Ms. Parker
and other black conservatives, regularly reinforce my conclusion, 
unbeknownth to them, with their own statements and statistics. For 
example, when in American history, not including slavery, during any 
era, under any political regime, under any sized government, regardless 
which political party the bulk of black voter preferred, recession, 
depression, boom, or bust when the percentage of black unemployment 
did not exceed the percentage of white unemployment? 
Irey RESERVES FOR and DEMANDS FROM the "Black Conservative" THAT THEY PROVE(!!!!) at any time, REGARDLESS of whom was in power in government that there were MORE NEGROES EMPLOYED THAN WHITE FOLKS.


The proper rebuttal to Irey's statements should be reserved for the Blax News column next door.
HAVE YOU EVER SEEN Irey - upon receiving a solicitation from an EMBEDDED CONDIFENCE MAN - seeking to troll the Black Community for a despit of more EQUAL BLACK BALLOTS and BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS - that Irey RAN THEM BACK across the river - telling them that he is "TIRED OF THEM STRINGGING BLACK PEOPLE ALONG - FOR MORE THAN 50 YEARS OF VOTING" because.................................using his own words:


For example, when in American history, not including slavery, during any era, under any political regime, under any sized government, regardless which political party the bulk of black voter preferred, recession, 
depression, boom, or bust when the percentage of black unemployment 
did not exceed the percentage of white unemployment




Why then has Irey NEVER stopped the EMBEDDED CONFIDENCE MEN and the White Progressive Chishire Fox Ally from SELLING A BRIGHTER FUTURE for The Least Of These" when Irey's history proves otherwise?

YOU ARE AN INTELLECTUAL  FRAUD SIR!!!



 Contemporary 
ideologues may point out the deficiencies of “black leadership”, or 
liberal policies, or whatever. But there hasn’t always been black 
political leadership, and there must have been a time when liberal 
policies didn’t hold sway, or there would be no time, place, or policy 
regime for conservatives to “return” to. Yet, black unemployment has 
always exceeded white unemployment.
(My Spirit Of VIOLENCE is rising inside)

IREY can't bring himself to note that the:
BLACK PRESS DOES NOT point out the DEFICIENCES IN THE PEOPLE WHO "The Least Of These" INVESTED IN IN PHILLY, DETROIT, CHICAGO OR MEMPHIS.

IT IS BETTER TO NOT refer to them as "Black Leadership" - allowing the MAIN STREAM MEDIA to feel comfortable at treating them like REGULAR ELECTED OFFICIALS - AND the notion of the BLACK POLITICAL VOTING DISTRICT to be over turned.

When Irey and OTHERS are able to make note of the INVESTMENT OF THE VALUABLES of BLACK PEOPLE - after which the "Post-Racial Progressive Fundamentalist Joint Venture" has defined the narrative AND ascribed "The ENEMY" and his deeds to the masses of Black people - as they run their "Black Conscious Attention Filibuster" - THEN we can finally get around to measuring the EFFECTIVENESS of those who Irey calls "Black Leadership" NOT BY their success at using government power to close the RESOURCE GAP between the WHITE FOLKS on the northside - BUT INSTEAD upon how much ABSOLUTE GAINS can be measured UPON the Black Community as they matriculate throught he "Human Resources Development Institutions" that FAVORABLE PEOPLE NOW CONTROL.

WORSE THAN the ole tale of the "Black College Graduate And The White Boy With A Prison Record Go, Arm in Arm Looking For A Job" is the SHEER IGORANCE that allows people to ACCEPT the notion that "Black Unemployment has ALWAYS been higher than the national average" - this being satisfactory BECAUSE the person speaking ascribes this to CONTINUED RACISM rather than the incompetency of the people they INVESTED IN after they were convinced in "Change"

Pound for pound the "Korean Black Business Owners Association" has created more jobs and revenue streams within "Economic /Food Deserts" without the need for 'Political Leadership" here in this country.

They only need observant eyes cast upon the CONSUMER BEHAVIOR in the targeted community.

As long as their "human hair" suppliers in India and Brazil has Internet access the Koreans are able to buy up all of their inventory for sale in these same communities that Irey speaks about.

Creative persons can cogitate 
earnestly and probably come up with paragraphs of sociological, 
political, economic, psychological, or as some have speculated, even 
genetic reasons to explain this ethnography. But regardless the validity
or error of those reasons, they will not debase my observation that 
socioeconomically, particularly as involves employment, by way of 
Cartesian logic it is not unfounded to conclude there is a historical 
and continuing “black reality” and a “white reality”.
Do you get the sense that Irey has NO PLATFORM OF WORDS that are said against the "Black Racial Services Machine" which harvests the monopoly share of "Black Thought" as applied to "Hoped For Solutions" through American Politics.

He is unable to see that with the UNCHECKED ACCESS that these forces have to the Black Community Consciousness - at present - the VALIDITY of what he and the majority of Black Progressive Fundamentalist believe WILL NEVER BE CHALLENGED.

They - and Minister Al Sharpton - are advancing EQUALITY and JUSTICE after all.

Who wants to be against "Equality, Justice and Little Kittens"?

I get the feeling that Irey said the same thing to the 3 guys who chased him down - thinking that these words were going to stop them from "Kicking His Ass" - mostly for trying to make them feel stupid by using big words.


Irey begs the girl around the corner to stop hitting him.  He will stop talking in the way that irritates her.  It is for the best because the guys won't allow him to cry on their breasts while they are beating some sense into him.

I contend there is a similar divergence when contemplating the 
supposed virtues of the Second Amendment. If white Americans can 
celebrate the benefits and protections they owe principally and 
primarily to the Second Amendment, I don’t see how a similar celebration
can logically or realistically be fomented in the black community. The 
Second Amendment has generally been alternately a blugeon, threat, or a 
blight on black America, and is currently the host agent of a violent 
(and encouraged?) genocidal plague. 
The best rebuttal for Irey's comments are depicted in the picture to the right. 
The diagram above perfectly depicts the weakness of Irey's command of th real world.
With three dimensions in this "Cartesian" plot we see:

  • Within (and Among) the Black Community
  • The NATIONALIZED American Political Field Of Play
  • The International Black Diasporatic Zone - Outside Of "The Belly Of The American Capitalistic Beast"
Irey and fellow travelers understand that IF and WHEN their "Grand Demographic Shift" comes - and the population of Progressives exceeds the WHITE RIGHT WING - that "The Second Amendment is a Gonner".   The night that the last state passed the nullifying amendment - a grand after-party in Grant Park and elsewhere will be had.  

What Irey can't bring himself to accept - is that while his theatrics work to appeal to the hearty soul in search of debate - THE STREET PIRATE DON'T GIVE A DAMN about no SECOND AMENDMENT!!!!!!

After years of debasing "Natural Law" - which gives us the notion of the "Value Of LIFE" - Irey can't see that this respect for life TRUMPS the statutory regulation of GUNS - and IF the people who he has entrusted the care of the people who are victimized per his previous references were intellectually honest - they'd be focusing on instilling this HIGHER LEVEL VALUE into the people who are disparately made to react irrationally when a gun finds its way in to his hand.

Irey doesn't have to entertain the areas of the Earth upon which the "2nd Amendment" has no bearing.

Absent a "Controlling Legal Authority" - all bets are off.   You'd better have some means of defending yourself against those who don't care about "Natural Law".

Funny how Irey never made the point that if a sovereign state were to relinquish its military and depend upon the high mindedness of their potential enemies - this world would be a safer place. 

No comments: