|From the video: Please notice that it will never come to the mind of Professor Marc Lamont Hill to ask: "WHY is the Black academic/economic/employment situation still seriously lagging in the Mission Accomplished Zones - where WE helped lift FAVORABLE PEOPLE INTO POWER?" (See Philly, Chicago, Detroit, Newark, Atlanta, Memphis, etc)
This is yet another OPEN ENDED, Progressive Fundamentalist Indictment. They understand that no one within their ranks will ever think to ask of THEMSELVES: "HEY why aren't we recognizing the promised gains that we promised ourselves IF we channeled our valuables into the struggle that we are running for social justice?"
HOW TO NEGATE MARC LAMONT HILL'S TALKING POINT Of "They Only Seem To Be Offended When Its BLACK PEOPLE Receiving Affirmative Action"
If you fail to bring a TIME LINE and a GPS into a debate with a progressive fundamentalist like Prof Hill you will always lose.
Prof Hill practices the "They Are In The Mud Along With Us" debate scheme in which he justifies "Black Affirmative Action" but using his (and Prof Boyce Watkin's ) crown jewel: GEORGE W BUSH. Along with rich donors, athletes and legacy admissions.
The point that we must establish is that Prof Hill points to the DISADVANTAGE that Black people have once we submit our college application. He will NEVER be placed in a position to look at the ECOSYSTEM that the "Disadvantaged Minorities" have matriculated through and how, despite becoming the ESTABLISHMENT POWER within the key "Human Resource Development Institutions" - not only has his progressive fundamentalist ideology failed to create "The Unleast Of These" - NO ONE GOT FIRED FOR FAILING TO DEVELOP "The Blacks".
If you look carefully - Prof Hill will then shift the indictment saying (something like): "Here we are attempting to get qualified Blacks into college to DEVELOP BLACK PEOPLE - just as you are taunting me about - yet YOU want to close the door in this candidate's face".
What did Prof Hill say about GEORGE W BUSH? TWO STANDARD DEVIATIONS.
If you read this blog you will see ample references about my alternative solution to the "Directed Filibuster" called "Affirmative Action".
IF INDEED we were to properly govern the High School experience of the average Black student - there would be a SHIFT UPWARD - by TWO STANDARD DEVIATIONS - and thus MORE "Highly Qualified Black Students" would be in the pool of candidates for these elite schools with highly competitive admissions.
Prof Hill knows that you as Black people prefer hearing negation of GEORGE W BUSH as "self chum" than you are prepared to achieve your gains THROUGH THE INSTITUTIONS that you have invested your valuables into the people who now control them.
Prof Hill expressed INTELLECTUAL COWARDICE!!!
One need only look at the Philadelphia Public School system to see a prime example of how the convergence of failed social theories, coupled with a hijacked "Black Community Governance Culture" does more DAMAGE TO BLACK PEOPLE than the OFFENSIVENESS of a WHITE MAN in Texas who is a professor.
Prof Graglia will NEVER be appointed as the superintendent of any majority Black school system.
WHY doesn't Prof Hill focus his attention on those WHO CAN GET APPOINTED with popular blessing?
Why is it SUPERIOR what a WHITE MAN says about Black people and the impact of having ONE parent raising a child - when GOD made it so that ONE MAN and ONE WOMAN was needed to create the child?
IF YOU DO NOT LOOK AT THIS FROM A "PSYCHOLOGICAL" PERSPECTIVE RATHER THAN AN IDEOLOGICAL/POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE - YOU WILL NEVER UNDERSTAND "NEGRO THOUGHT".
I am listening to Black Wing Grievance Talk Radio. CBS Radio owned - WAOK AM Atlanta.
They are highly upset that a WHITE MAN who is a college professor in Texas said that with "Black Parental Single Motherhood approaching 75%.......................this will exacerbate the disadvantage that Black people face - academically, economically , socially".
"The Blacks" were OFFENDED when they called in to vent.
As the host allowed them to emote - they all focused on the OFFENSE MADE BY THE WHITE MAN.
They felt that their duty was to fire a volley and talk about the WHITE PEOPLE IN THE MUD WITH US - who also have an increase in single parenting.
Then they gave examples of all of the products of single parenting - Barack Obama being their crown jewel.
With these "Self-Chummed" examples they had sufficiently NEGATED the OFFENSIVE WORDS said by the WHITE MAN.
QUESTION: WHAT DOES THE BLACK COMMUNITY BELIEVE ABOUT WHAT IS NECESSARY FOR ORGANIC UPLIFT?
When I point out the "Recruited/ Employed And Paid Black Press" it is clear that they are deployed to dangle certain ideas in the Black Conscious Attention Span.
In the spirit of "Follow The Money" - someone knows how Black people think - and they keep the base appeased with that which they know is succulent
The only way to counter these "Embedded Confidence Man" forces is to remain knowledgeable about the entire universe of issues and then make note of WHAT THEY DON'T TALK ABOUT because it would compromise their agenda.
- Does the present prevailing culture accentuate "Black Male/Female" relationships?
- Does the present prevailing culture prompt Black parents to YIELD their individual wills to a higher authority so that, in unity, a certain amount of synergy is created - for the benefit of their child?
- Does the present prevailing culture establish a set of AGGREGATE POINTS OF CONSCIOUSNESS that are transmitted to the next generation as their NORMS
- Of the "NORMS" that are being transmitted - are they in line with the structure that is needed to support your desired standard of living?
The "Malcolm X Political Football Game" in which BLACK 'OFFENDEDNESS'' provides the cover for the COMPROMISE of BLACK COMMUNITY INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY
is the worst thing to ever happen to Black people in America - that Black people WILLINGLY participated in. (Please note the conjunction).
There is no other body of observable behavior performed by Black people that can prove the EQUALITY OF BLACK PEOPLE and thus the need for REGULATION lest we fall into performing the very same wicked actions that we so often condemn other people for doing.
We are attuned to focusing upon "Suppression".
We index the dimensions of our own "Universe" of WHAT WE SHOULD HAVE (in our grocery stores, in our schools, in our houses) based upon a fixation on what this "Amorphous RICH WHITE MAN has".