Sunday, September 02, 2012

University Of North Carolina Panel Discusses How The South Will Be Impacted By Future Demographic Changes - Claims That The Republicans Must Change To D0

If I told you that both political parties in America are more concerned with gaining nation power through attrition than they can claim to have a credible plan to correct the fatal decline that confronts this nation - would this be a surprise?

As a person who is very well versed on the condition of Black people in the South and the North I am stunned to see people "Keeping Their Enemy On Trial" so their lies by omission makes someone believe that "The Blacks" in the North are doing dramatically better because they have ORGANIC productive competencies that their "Country Cousins" in the South lack.

The goal of this panel of individuals (which the commentator below admits is overly skewed toward the advantage of the Democrats) is to make the case that "The South" and its right-wing politics are the cause of the continued poverty.  If they would just become "Progressive" - just like "The North" (and Europe) the fortunes of "The Least Of These" - having been delivered from hateful policies - would dramatically improve.

Of course - the primary channel for this Southern change in fortunes is for the region to "Become More Progressive By Flipping Into Democratic States".

Do you notice that we are never treated to analysis of how "Entrenched Blue States Are A Threat To The Economic And Cultural Conditions For People Who Need Structure And Sound Economic Foundations?"

Does anyone notice that most conversations about the "Politics Of Poverty" never remain planted WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY - but instead seeks to start out in the US Capitol or White House?



Charlotte Observer: Race, poverty and education all factors in a changing landscape

From The Article
“I think that the big question facing us in this election is which map prevails,” Guillory said.Scott Keener of the nonpartisan Pew Research Center said white voters in the South are much more likely than their white counterparts elsewhere to vote Republican and support GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney. Black voters inside and outside the South are strongly aligned with Democrats and President Barack Obama, while the growing Hispanic minority in the South could take a much stronger role in future elections, as children reach voting age, he said. 
“This is really a ticking time bomb, in some respects, for the Republican Party,” Keener said.
Do you ever read an article such as the one above and anticipate a comment about the NATIONAL PATTERN OF BLACK VOTING - regardless of the outcomes that transpire after the attainment of the "Mission Accomplished" state?   Do you notice that these analysts never appraise "The Blacks" from the stand point of the grand set of theories that have been adopted, implemented yet fall short, - all with the assumption that BLACK PEOPLE ARE EQUALLY CAPABLE of making CHOICES that turn out to be the wrong choices for their community 
 development?    Is there any surprise that most of these "academics" are progressives and thus they are happy with the present ideological orientation and the "Struggle Motion" of "The Blacks" - regardless of the outcomes or the damage to our interests?

(Note the proper answer to the challenge is NOT "Why don't more Black people vote for Republicans?".   IT is "Knowing what they know about INVESTING into POLITICS - Why Do So Many Blacks Stake Their 'Community Development Hopes' In Politics And Voting, rather than taking a more DEFENSIVE strategy - working harder to keep the EMBEDDED CONFIDENCE MEN [those who keep selling them upon a political solution] out of their Community Consciousness Nucleus as they find more effective, non-Political means of community development and uplift?")

Why do they pretend to CARE ABOUT THE FUTURE OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY?
Can we go to the various "Mission Accomplished Cities" that the GOP has been run out of power and see a STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT "Organic Black Community Development" in place?
It is clear that the WHITE VOTER is the "Prime Stock" Voter in America.  He is expected to drop his "bigotry" and stop opposing what is in the 'Best Interests Of The Nation" - which is PROGRESSIVISM - in the view of the ideological bigot who is taunting him for his 'racism'.


From The Article
Some panelists said poverty has been ignored by both parties, even as it has grown more prevalent in the South.“We have more poor people and more political leaders who are untroubled by it than other parts of the country,” said law professor Gene Nichol, director of the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity.Several speakers said the South’s economic boom has been stalled by the recession and increased global competition, especially for low-wage jobs. Creating a better-educated work force is a key to the future, they said.“Southern workers have to become more skilled, and whether or not there’s the political will to bring this about is a key question,” said Peter Coclanis, a history professor who specializes in economics and business.
I believe that most of these panelists can't bring themselves to go beyond their view of the role of POLITICS and instead make note of how GOVERNANCE and ENTRENCHED CULTURE (among all of the races) are the greater problem than is POLITICS in the South and the Northeast and Central regions. 

From The Article
Kareem Crayton, an associate law professor who studies race and politics, said North Carolina is unique among Southern states in maintaining a significant Democratic presence and in “racial coalition building,” though he questioned whether those coalitions will prove lasting.History professor Jacquelyn Hall said she thinks today’s racial rifts come not from the legacy of slavery and racism in the South but from “deliberate policies and deliberate propaganda” that have been part of the Republicans’ Southern strategy.“Part of that strategy had to do with demonizing the policies that came out of the civil rights movement,” Hall said, citing affirmative action, busing “and, of course, ‘the welfare queen.’ ”King said the panel was designed to be nonpartisan, though some remarks were more tilted toward the Democrats’ view than she expected. The forum was linked to the convention but not sponsored by it.

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/09/02/3498928/unc-panel-changing-demographics.html#storylink=cpy
If we took Professor Jacquelyn Hall to North Philly or Newark where THERE ARE NO REPUBLICANS that can "OFFEND" The Least Of These - by calling them "Welfare Queens" and she still sees abundant poverty, lack of education and interpersonal dysfunction - does anyone believe that she could get beyond HER OWN "Ideological Bigotry" and find something other than the tired "Welfare Queen" / "Southern Strategy" / "Angry Black Man" rhetoric that is used to obfuscate the Black community's attention away from the forces that are taking their valuables yet failing to DEVELOP THEM THROUGH THE INSTITUTIONS that they now dominate with?

No comments: