Black-Wing Grievance Talk Radio Shows What Is Of SUPERIOR Interest To Them Based Upon The Subjects Their Callers Prefer To Talk About And How The Hosts Lead Them Along That Path In The Name Of "Congregational Unity"

I still struggle to understand how a civilian named "George Zimmerman" is able to assume SUPERIOR attributes to that of a police man that has suppressed Black people for decades,  the officer of today having assumed the role of the "Slave Overseer".

Yet when it fits your argument and your agenda to satisfy the "Congregation" that is listening in to your radio program, seeing affirmation of their views through you - you now assume the disposition of the mass public who believed that the criminal justice system should used to keep its thumb upon criminal suspects, hauling them in and out of jail to teach them a lesson.  The system is thus used as a proxy for your own hatred and bigotry.

THIS IS NOT A DEFENSE OF GEORGE ZIMMERMAN!!

This is an observation of YOUR - "100% Equality" with the adversary that is so much the focus of your scrutiny when they use the system in the very same way that you seek to use it when YOU have a worthy target in your scope.

We must conclude that you are no more morally or spiritually guided than your adversary which you indict for his bigotry and corruption.
You merely nave never been in the position to express this equality that is within you.

The liberal disposition in which you call for "mercy" and "the benefit of the doubt" is only reserved for YOUR "criminal defendants" not the criminal defendants from the "other tribe".   They are a prized possession that you hope to get as many "Perp Walks" out of the situation so that they will appear as your headlines, allowing you to justify your incompetence in covering the PRIORITIES within the Black Community which go unchecked.

As I observe you in aggregate, among different venues - MY concern is that as you go off and express your "Equality" - the resources that you were supposed to govern is allowed to wither from inattention.    You clearly prefer to focus on issues that will rile you up into "Congregational Unity" - affirming your own sense of righteousness.

The more difficult issues that require you to work WITHIN YOUR COMMUNITY to achieve the desired ends prove more challenging and contentious.   The toes that you have to step upon in order to effect change creates the factionalism that is the consequence of your previous failure to develop STRONG INSTITUTIONS within your ranks.

The longer you go without confronting this internal challenge - the more you need to make use of the current mass manipulation tricks in order to string the people along in the name of UNITY, playacting them into believing that what they value IN THEIR PRESENT CONSCIOUSNESS is critically important in the big picture, when it isn't.