Friday, May 04, 2012

Why Are Racist Whites Who Still Won't Vote For Obama SUPERIOR To MSNBC Over Their Discussions Of Obama's Handling Of The Debt And Killing Of Terror Suspects With Drones?

What do you do when you are a progressive-fundamentalist operative, you are in the news media and thus receive all of the information that me (a CONSUMER of their news products) and others receive about the present state of affairs in the nation BUT you have a vested interest in reducing the INDICTMENTS of the "Favorable People" you want to protect, while making maximum indictments against your ideological enemies.   It is easily proven that when YOUR favorable people violate the principles that YOU held dear - your corruption provokes you to run a massive diversion scheme.

George S Schuyler was correct:  There is no "Black Agenda".  There is a "Progressive Agenda" with a "LampBlacked" coating on it.   My understanding from this is that "The Black Agenda is a Progressive agenda that PURPORTS to seek uplift for Black people USING Progressive Public Policy".

This main damage to the interests of the Black Community - is that when it FAILS, producing measurable injury to Black people (ie: lack of development after taking control over our "Human Resource Development Institutions") it always chooses to defend its IDEOLOGY over the interests of Black people, namely by erecting checks and balances between our community's interests and the ideological/political operations.

This is a key setup of my observation of a recent MSNBC report on White RACIST(!!!) voters.

Let's start off with the model for the argument that I agree with MSNBC in their intent.


ANYONE who is a voter in America and who, upon assessing their interests with regard to public policy and the representation of their interests, who then (seemingly) rejects these interests and instead allows some BIGOTED viewpoint to cause them to invest their vote in a contradictory manner is indeed a BIGOTED VOTER


My problem with MSNBC and other racism chasers is that they superiorize RACIAL bigotry over IDEOLOGICAL bigotry.


A White Progressive researcher noted the regional distinctions in WHITE SUPPORT
for Barack Obama.   Various analysts took this data and then made the case that The South is RACIST
per its unwillingness to vote for a Democrat a Black man.

BLAX Economic Policy Institute For Action & Change

In The 2008 BLAX Economic Policy Institute For Action & Change noted that there is NO statistically significant Regional differences in the BLACK VOTE.  
Black Americans voted for the Democrats to a tune of 96%.

For some reason this did not trigger the ire in White Progressive news organizations as did the news that White folks in the South who were called racists despite having only a 90% support for the Republican candidate.


BLAX Economic Policy Institute For Actin & Change evaluation of the differences in Black voting for the Democrats between 2004 in which a White Democrat was the candidate versus 2008 in which a Black Democrat was the candidate.

Again there were no regional differences detected in the Black vote.
BLAX found that an increase in Blacks voting for the Democrats were seen as "Free Range Negro" Black Republicans like Colin Powell, Armstrong Williams, Fox News' Charles Payne crossed over and voted for Barack Obama because he is Black.


Even though President Obama won the election and won hardily - the presence of WHITE FOLKS who voted to never vote for a Black man IS the story - 4 years later.
The reason why MSNBC ran with this story is because it produces an INDICTMENT.   In the context of the "Uneven Recovery" that would cause an impact on most other incumbents as people consider their own economic interests - the presence of RACISM(!!!!) can trigger what MSNBC and others don't want to talk about:   IDEOLOGICAL BIGOTRY.

When it comes to the Black vote (Note I am focusing on "The Black Vote" but not making the claim that it is exclusive to Black people) it is IDEOLOGICAL bigotry that expresses itself in what White people are indicted for RACIAL bigotry.





As it stands with the present prevailing political discourse among Black people - we are not inclined to vote in a manner that is different from what the messaging within indicates is "natural Black".
IF there were objective social scientists who were interested in studying Black people in a dispassionate manner they would look past what is POPULAR with Black people (and enforced) and instead look at our behavior that indicates what is within.   Look at the U-Haul Trucks parked in front of residences in "Mission Accomplished Zones" and track where the "Black Flight Progressives" who assisted in bringing forth the presiding political machine is moving to.

A few years ago when MSNBC's Rachel Maddow visited Detroit to tell of the damage suffered to  a set of pregnant Black teenagers as their school was being shut down for financial reason - she DID NOT "put the pieces together" which indicated that this is yet another consequence of the failed economic policies of the city of Detroit.  She used Detroit as her poster child of how the state Republican austerity programs were injuring "the Least Of These".

I am puzzled as to why Rachel Maddow (and Black Eagle Joe Martin) were not heard warning the people of Detroit 10 or 20 years ago about the negative impact that the progressive public policy takeover might render upon them one day.  That the time is now to MODERATE for the sake of the city.

Instead they appear to have the clarity to "put the pieces together" and always skip over the forces that they supported into power and then render an indictment against their external ideological enemies.   The benign neglect of the larger society always trumps in their argument.






With respect to the national election - though there were several reports which:

  • Showed the disparity in support for Obama among WHITE FOLKS between Southern states and the rest of them
  • A recent report that said "RACISM" cost Obama as much as 5% of the vote..................
There was NEVER a report in MSNBC or the NY Times or Washington Post that looked at the existing prevailing Democratic Machine where Black people live, the results that it has garnered and the 95% support for President Obama - a member of that same MACHINE that has failed to develop the people in these areas - in line with their PROMISES.

My point is that IDEOLOGICAL BIGOTRY produces the same distorted results that RACIAL BIGOTRY does.

My drive is NOT go get Black people to show that we are not bigoted by voting for REPUBLICANS. 
My goal is to remove the BIGOTS who drive us to VOTE FOR OUR SALVATION - out of our "Racial Consciousness Nucleus" so that we can put VOTING into its proper proportion with regards to the various forces needed for our development.  

The Embedded Confidence Men and their press agents seek to make VOTING the primary act in America for obtaining our "social justice ends".   This comes in the context of the high stakes, centralized political orientation that America has gravitated toward.

MSNBC's Ideological Protection Racket
  • America has had 3 years of + $1.2T annual deficits 
  • The debt ceiling will need to be raised past $16.x T by the end of 2012
  • Almost 2 weeks ago the federal government released an official report telling of the accelerated insolvency of both Social Security and Medicare
  • The present policy by the US Military in dealing with TERROR SUSPECTS is that water boarding is banned because it is torture.   Water Boarding is no longer needed, however, as these suspects are being KILLED BY DRONES!!!

The subjects of "The National Fiscal Crisis", "The Entitlement Programs" and "Torture In The 'War On Terrorism" have been key debate in political discourse AND subject of activism in the Progressive-Fundamentalist press.

If we use their past activism on all of these points as an index to how they are acting today - everyone who is honest must conclude that they are minimizing their reporting on these points and the resulting ADVOCACY among the opinion operatives has similarly been scrubbed or redirected.

The release of the book by Jose Rodriguez, former CIA operative that was involved with the water boarding policy will bring this torture debate back into the public domain.   The operatives who wish to continue their indictment against the Bush Administration on TORTURE are going to seek a narrow discussion.   

They understand that if they were to express a measure of "intellectual curiosity", seeking to understand what the US machine is presently doing with terror suspects that they will have to note that they are not being CAPTURED (and imprisoned and tortured).  They are being KILLED BY DRONES!!!

This is not an accident.  
This is engineering.

No rational person can proclaim that a worse "war crime" is made via water boarding than is the case with active surveillance and bombing.   It is more accurate to say that the bombing and indiscriminate killing is a more effective way to nullify the threat from residual debates and indictments.  The person with standing who can claim that he was tortured IS NOW DEAD!!!!   This also effectively nullifies the ACLU as they would have to go against an Administration that they ultimately find more favorable than the alternative.

We must understand that the ultimate victor of this aggregate action is that THE MACHINE is the victor in this ideological bias.   It is still operating with the ideological protection racket supporting its present deadly efforts. 




No comments: