- The Military violations of their MORALITY on Due Process for people that the American government says are "Terrorists"
- The Economic violations of the MORALITY of greatly expanding the American debt - running more than $1.2T in arrears per year - which is going to ultimately threaten the SOCIAL JUSTICE DISTRIBUTION Programs that the people are being made dependent upon
Still the most significant MORAL COMPROMISE of our time has nothing to do directly with Barack Obama.
For anyone with MORAL INTEGRITY to retain their HONOR - they must look beyond the stage where President Obama now stands and instead cast their eyes INTO THE CONGREGATION. The systematic vicarious living of the Black Community THROUGH President Obama has caused untold damage to the INSTITUTIONAL INTEGRITY of the controls WITHIN THE BLACK COMMUNITY.
As such the masses of people can be compelled to focus so much of their CONSCIOUS ATTENTION about themselves as a people upon the TRANSACTIONAL SUCCESS of this venerated object upon the stage and his battles in the "Malcolm X Political Football Game" that they no longer focus on the objective measurement of the GROWTH of their own interests - which they are seen developing through their own capabilities - but instead are placing these interests into FORBEARANCE so that none of their criticism for these unmet goals - after more than 50 years of massive investments - are allowed to damage the standing of this venerated individual.
IRONICALLY HIS PLACE IN OFFICE ITSELF IS EVIDENCE OF THEIR ADVANCEMENT.
This stands true in their mind - as long as they don't measure the amount of other Blacks who have matriculated through the INSTITUTIONS that they now have control over.
As a consequence they are heard saying in public: "WE ARE NOW IN THE WHITE HOUSE". When they later are heard saying "We need to remind the President of the priorities of Black America and HELP HIM bring them to the forefront" - they can't see that LOGICALLY.......................THEY ARE TALKING TO THEMSELVES.
Worse - they never ask themselves "WHY did WE give the green light to bomb several African nations - as we have great sensitivities of past European exploitation of our ancestor's lands".
IF Comcast/ NBC-Universal / MSNBC knows Black people enough for THEM to make the assessment that their Comcast office in the Black neighborhood needs bullet proof glass for protection that is not necessary at their office in a White community - is it possible that they also know about the Black community enough to assemble a set of "Agreeable Negroes" to appear on camera - who will never thing to CHALLENGE "The Black Racial Services Machine?
Last Week Michele Bernard appeared on the NPR Show "Tell Me More" as they discussed President Obama's visit to Afghanistan.
Ms Bernard argued the President Obama should be applauded for KEEPING HIS WORD in removing US Troops from both Iraq and Afghanistan.
The problem with the argument that sets up fake "Key Performance Indicators" for President Obama is that he won't ever be blamed for what the "Anti-War Protesters" had blamed his predecessor for.
Despite having extended the mission - they will say that this is "Bush's War".
Sadly - with this logic the "fallen solder" that was stored in the cargo cabin in a flight that I was recently on - is not considered a casualty of Commander In Chief Obama's Decision To Extend The War And Increase The Troops During His Presidency.
The main loss is to the credibility of the "JingOists" and the Institutional Integrity that they claim to represent.
My post, transcribed from Booker Rising
Dear Michelle Bernard:
You say MORAL LEADERSHIP.
You likely also use the talking point of 'MARRIAGE EQUALITY'.
Lets strip away these Progressive-Fundamentalist talking points and note the gross irony of this latest "Progressive Base Hit".
We can conclude from this latest drive at "Equality" that there is some intrinsic value on MARRIAGE.
The Progressive-Fundamentalists argue that by expanding access to the institution of marriage - a great moral apex has been reached.
My position is that a BODY OF THOUGHT that has proved itself INCOMPETENT at stemming the tide of the DECLINE of heterosexual marriage and that has NO RECORD WHAT SO EVER at coming into power in a community that had a low marriage rate and afterward INCREASED IT - cannot be allowed to take control over the larger rungs of society/culture/government.
Think about it Mr Bernard - the issue of:
* VOTING As A Methodology For Good Living....................
ARE ALL foundational leftist longitudinal struggles.
THE ONLY PROBLEM, Mr Bernard is that when we -
* Look at where the Progressive Fundamentalist is the last "moral compass" standing on male/female relationships
* Look at where the Progressive Fundamentalists take control over schools and are tasked with educating the DIVERSE STUDENT POPULATIONS that promoted them into administrative power
* Look at where THE VOTE of THE LEAST OF THESE is not MOLESTED and they promote the PROGRESSIVE REPRESENTATION to implement PROGRESSIVE PUBLIC POLICY..............................
these PUBLIC GOOD that the base has 'STRUGGLE FOR' through POLITICS are the very attributes that ARE NOT DELIVERED TO THEM.
You fail to see that when a Progressive-Fundamentalist is tooling the GOVERNMENT - indeed he can make what appears to be PROGRESS.
It is when we reach the point where he must obtain INCREASE by going THROUGH THE PEOPLE in support of their own DEVELOPMENT - the INSTITUTIONS that were ATTACKED as suppressive, exclusive and unfair are no longer able to support the desired INCREASE among the people.
Tell me, Mrs Bernard :
* What good is the RIGHT TO MARRY when the society members who have their liberties maximized no longer partake (see Spain right now)
* What good is the RIGHT TO A QUALITY EDUCATION when your STRUGGLE for an all encompassing educational bureaucracy becomes ITSELF more of a JOBS PROGRAM than an educational excellence institution?
* Finally - what happens when you see the NAACP avoiding going to Detroit, Flint, Newark and Philly - DEMANDING that the people who THEY PUT INTO POWER are now made to PRODUCE FOR BLACK PEOPLE - because they understand that they can't attack their PROGRESSIVE FRIENDS - and since BLACK PEOPLE who have a certain CONSCIOUSNESS are not going to run them out of office for taking their BALLOT INVESTMENTS yet failing them - WHEN THE NAACP instead focuses on an EXTERNAL THREAT from Photo ID - the congregation dutifully follows along with the diversion trick.
GIVE EVERY CITIZEN of Detroit - TWO BALLOTS to vote in their municipal elections only and VOTING for their FAVORED PEOPLE while their present CONSCIOUSNESS remains is not going to change a DAMNED THING about their condition.
The grand failure of your argument is that IT WAS THE THINKING that provoked Black people to follow along - yet after more than 50 years of PROGRESSIVE BASE HITS that are pleasing to the Negro - the National Urban League report STILL lists us as INFERIORS.
(Seriously - you really need to stop hanging around those "Paid Blacks" at MSNBC. They are distorting your thinking).