If you reject all other points of my argument regarding the hijacked consciousness within the Black Community the one thing that stands without dispute is:
"The Legal Status Of The Death Penalty" (As Rendered By The Government) is irrelevant to the issue of "Murdered Black People On The Streets Of America"
It is my contention that some of those forces who have gained the confidence of our community based upon the promises of advancement that they would bring forth have a vested interest in having the Black conscious focus shifted from the matter of "Street Pirate On Black" murder over toward the GOVERNMENT, compelling it to stop killing Black people via the death penalty. They hope that you don't notice the number of dead Black bodies that the crowd had to step over on their way to the protest rally in front of the offending government building.
The Previous Ban Of The Death Penalty 1972-1976
Source: US Crime Stats
My argument IS NOT that "The Death Penalty Serves As A Deterrent To Murder".
My argument IS that while you claim your MORAL SUPERIORITY by focusing on having the GOVERNMENT to ban the capital punishment that is offensive to your soul...................................you have failed to set up an EFFECTIVE means within the society that you have increasing influence upon to compel the individuals who receive their consciousness from your product to value human life and not murder another person.
Year
|
Total Murders
|
Total State Executions
|
Ratio - Executions / Murder
|
1971
|
17, 780
|
0
|
0
|
1972
|
18, 670
|
0
|
0
|
1973
|
19,640
|
0
|
0
|
1974
|
20,710
|
0
|
0
|
1975
|
20,510
|
0
|
0
|
1976
|
18,780
|
0
|
0
|
2010
|
14,748
|
46
|
0.31%
|
QUESTION:
Can a person / movement that commits as their top priority the prohibition of state sponsored executions while in the midst of mass carnage by individuals on the streets that they are responsible for claim to have ownership of the moral high ground?
OR does he stand higher than others because he stands upon the corpses of murder victims that allows him to achieve the necessary moral elevation as long as others agree that these murders are INFERIOR to those which are conducted by the state?
There are no reported cases by which a Street Pirate Murderer admits that he had doubts yet executed the wrong human being. He merely goes out and kills the correct person during a second hit, never admitting his mistake.


No comments:
Post a Comment