The "Color Of Progressive Change": Racial Indictments Used As A Cover For A Progressive-Fundamentalist Enforcement Scheme

Black political group demands firing of Fox Business Network host



I had never heard of the Fox Business network host Eric Bolling prior to his use of the racial invective in reference to Obama.

The more disturbing part of the story from my perspective - is that 96% or more of Black Americans had never heard of him before either.  
You see when it comes to business and finance news:

• CNBC
• Bloomberg
• Fox Business
• Nightly Business Report on PBS

speak a different language than what is heard on "Fight The Power - Black Talk Radio".  

It is rather ironic that my previous invitations to other Black people that they should tune into the news sources listed above in order to understand another perspective on the fiscal and economic and financial market debates that are going on today - was largely ignored.  YET the light was shined upon the Fox Business Network because the forces of Media Matters had let Black people know that one of its talk show hosts had "insulted the Black President".

The sight of various actuarial charts which show big red flashing warnings about the future of pension funds, Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and the general solvency of the Federal Government itself are pushed aside as the Progressive-Fundamentalists believe that by fighting against a POLITICAL ENEMY that threatens to cut the distributions from these programs or budgets is the key to proving these charts to be a LIE is quite telling of their own consciousness.  In their responses they show that they are a "struggle movement" that drive unity in protest but  lack the necessary organicism to produce the resources necessary to have the maximum number of Americans contributing to the pot from which these resources are drawn.

In the world of "Social Justice" - the value of a "budget" is how much it distributes to "The Least Of These".  They have little concern in measuring how many of these same people become the "Un-least of these" and thus able to produce net excess that can be handed off to a person with lesser means.  

The contempt that I have for "Color Of Progressive Change" comes from my knowledge through observation that they OFFER NOTHING to the Black community beyond their expert skills at RACISM CHASING and enforcement of "Message Suppression via Gotcha Politics".  RACISM being the supreme disqualifier in their world.

As I have tuned in to Eric Bolling after this incident (via my Tivo recordings) I see that the problem is not the one (or a few) references to Obama with a racial invective.  The problem that the Media Matters Progressives have against Bolling is that the bulk of his commentary stands against the entire economic package that the Progressives wish to impose upon us.   "Color Of Change" is merely an agent of the George Sorros Constellation of operatives, specially carved out because the indictment of RACISM AGAINST BLACK PEOPLE has a certain superior ranking in the indictment scale.

The problem with Color Of Change is that as a "Non-White White Supremacist" organization it is able to filter past the forces that do the most significant damage to the interests of the Black community and only focus on those which have a particular IDEOLOGICALLY based offense to their sentiments.  They are a "Neo-All White Jury" except that IDEOLOGY rather than RACE is the focus of their bigotry.

While CoC protested the former governor of South Carolina, demanding that he take "Obama Debt Stimulating Stimulus Money" so that......."Black children's education would not be cut" - this same fraudulent organization is SILENT as other states and cities with far larger concentrations of Black students wield their budget acts.  Long story short - when Democratic mayors and governors make cuts as did "Republican Governors", impacting more Black children - the Color Of Change sees no vector for marginalization so they are SILENT.   

As always - judge the Progressive-Fundamentalist Bigot NOT by what he is upset over.  Look at what he SHOULD BE UPSET OVER with regards to its negative impact upon Black people - and note his SILENCE.   He chooses not to stand against his "Permanent Friend" who he helped get into office, lest he have to put PROGRESSIVISM itself on trial and risk pointing out its failures.

A Tiger Never Changes Its Stripes

I admitted my previous mistake about the blog "Crooks And Liars".  I had looked past the fact that they "Advertise Liberally" and figured that they would "Speak Truth To Power' to ANYONE IN POWER.  When the tides shifted and we got an all Democratic/Progressive Federal government - to compliment the Democratic Progressive forces in many states and "Mission Accomplished Cities" - I figured that "Crooks and Liars" would begin focusing on the 'crooks and liars' that were now in power - speaking truth to them.

I was wrong.  They shifted from ATTACKING the seat of power over to ATTACKING the minority that threatened to blog the PROGRESSIVE AGENDA that was being forwarded by those in power.  

The main flaw of these Progressive-Fundamentalist - JingOist operations is that they have no bearings in their determination of where their investments in the Democratic/Progressive Establishment ENDS and where their own PERMANENT INTERESTS continue walking alone. 

Since they stand on the METHODOLOGY called "Progressivism" (and to be clear Conservative groups suffer the same problem) - they are unable to objectively admit that some problems do not lend themselves to solution using this particular METHODOLOGY.  Other tools are necessary when the "constructive feedback" given as results show dramatic shortfalls.

A strange circumstance exists in the "Mission Accomplished Cities".  As they win the victory of removing all conservative threats from POWER (see Chicago, Philadelphia, Atlanta, Washington DC, Baltimore, Detroit, Los Angeles, Newark, Camden and Milwaukee) they are unable to hold these places up as reference models of how their theories, when unmolested by proximate conservative acrimony, bring the achieved state of "Social Justice" to the masses that invested their ballots and their spirit into the progressive struggle.

When faced with such a dilemma, with the risk of a revolt as the lumpen proletariat realizes that they have been sold a bill of goods begin to turn against those who are now in local power - the Progressive-Fundamentalist knows that he must EXPAND THE DOMAIN OF HIS INDICTMENT.   This allows those who are kept united by "The Struggle Motion" to remain bound to a STRUGGLE.  

The ironic point about the ascension of Obama and the Democratic domination through the entire architecture of certain local domains (ie: New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts Illinois, Wisconsin, California had a one party dominated government from local to state to federal) is that their minions were more motivated by what the previous enemy regime had done to injure their standing (often they used Bill Clinton as the perfect reference for Progressive increase) but they were able to convince themselves that Obama - following the very same track as Bush when it came to:

• Deficit Spending
• War Making
• Tax Cuts

was doing so because he was undoing the damage from the last administration OR he was dealing with "Hostage Takers".  

In short my previous assessment that PROGRESSIVISM IS IN-ORGANIC stands.  They are loathed to acknowledge any original sins on their part.  Instead that which happens on their watch which falls short of the original promise is a matter of:

• Enemy Opposition
• Or when the enemy is not around - His failure to provide redistributed "Social Justice" where it is needed

In short - THEY CAN'T LOSE as long as they don't lose their base of fellow travelers.

The Business Networks Represent Corporatism

There should be no one surprised that several notable voices from the ranks of the business news channels have run into the propellers of the progressive media operatives.  Is I read various hard left magazines each month (ISR, Dollars & Sense, Z, The Nation) it is clear that they believe that corporations have too much power in this nation and that only SUPREME GOVERNMENT POWER can check them.

Likewise the views of several notable business channel operatives which stand against the Progressive drive to tip the balance of power to a strong central government and thus attack Obama - the "Progressive Football Carrier" in the process - understand who their adversary is.

No one should be foolish enough to believe that Color Of Change is merely motivated by the RACIALLY OFFENSIVE use of the word "In The Hizzous" on the Fox Business Channel as their motivation to pick off another News Corporation television host and then have a war dance around his carcass.  

Behind this lurks the "Malcolm X Political Football Game".  The Color of Change merely represents the segregated "Special Teams" operation which purports to be advancing the interests of Black people for the Progressive Team.

We should not look at their indictments over racial offenses of a noted character.  

Instead it is important that we know ourselves and the dimensions of our fully recognized SELVES and then realize how short the operatives in The Color Of Change are in their ability to represent our Fully Erect Disposition.  

This consciousness can NEVER be allowed to reside uncontested inside of our Racial Consciousness Nucleus.  In doing so they will molest our interests in support of their marginal ideological biases.