The Selective Indictment Between Those Who Dare Ignore The 14Th Amendment Vs The 2nd Amendment

You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!

I value historical documentaries about "Jim Crow" and the "Civil Rights Movement". It allows me to see what my people had to deal with. More importantly it has me appreciating what I no longer have to deal with today.

The central theme of the struggle was to have the Black community PROTECTED from the wanton assault upon our basic humanity by an array of forces who desperately sought to keep us terrorized and intimidated so that they could have their way with us.

The issue of "Community Protection" is a central theme.  The "community organizers" stated that in as much as they bear the ultimate responsibility for protecting the households in their community - since the police and other government authorities were failing to do so, as they have a varying amount of complicity with the assailants, the Black community was ultimately responsible for its own protection.

These leaders were the first Black Americans to express the theory "don't start none - won't be none".  Their enemies knew the threat of this "balance of power".

Seeing the Black community seeking to take up arms to defend itself and knowing that THEY were the ones behind the hoods - the authorities sought out ways to restrict guns and ammo in the hands of the Black community.    The "2nd Amendment rights" be damned.

The video above shows left-wing activist Angela Davis responding to a reporters question about elements that promote VIOLENCE contained in the "Black Panther Party".  She does a good job in rebuking the challenge - making note of how her community in Birmingham Alabama was terrorized by those who used violent means to "keep Black people in their place".   What they now see as "violence" by Black people is merely a justified stance of DEFENSIVENESS against those who "DON'T GIVE A DAMN" about live up to a higher sense of honor.

I support Angela Davis' position on this point.   The challenge for the Progressive is to move from his mandate of having those with HONOR to live up to a certain standard over to working with those who "DON'T GIVE A DAMN WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THEM" to live up to a higher standard.   If you can do so peacefully and without assembling an equal and opposite force of power - have at it.


The 2nd Amendment
Notice in the video below the caviler manner in which our 2nd Amendment rights are cast away as "antique", irrelevant to our civilized society of today.  There is no chance that any of these people will be called "Molesters Of The US Constitution".   When it comes to the "2nd Amendment" as long as the "Progressive Consciousness" of the nation agrees that this one entry is a stain upon the constitution and they mutual consent to look past it - one is called a hero in his role as a "defender of a peaceful society".

The carrot dangled before the people with this consciousness is that IF they one day achieve their regulatory control over the gun industry and slowly wean them out of existence - America will have "progressed" closer to the true spirit of its founding.

You dare mention that the "14th Amendment" was focused on allowing "freed enslaved Blacks" citizenship and NOT for allowing those who snuck into this nation you are considered a KLANSMAN.  If you suggest that we ignore or amend out the 2nd Amendment you are a visionary.

If you agree that the government should engrave serial numbers upon bullets - THIS type of increased government is fine.  If you support that same government tracking library card usage then you are an oppressor.

Mr Stockman - I ARGUE FOR MY GUN.   When you get those who don't give a damn about the law and they acquire guns anyway - then we can talk.  Until then you are a violator of the Constitution, no difference than a free speech oppressor.

You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!

Talk To The Street Pirates And Make Him Respect The Other Text Of The US Constitution

I am an owner of several hand guns.  I stash them in my house and my vehicles.  I assure you that my possession of these potentially deadly weapons does not increase the threat of offensive assault and violence in our society.  If you ever hear about me in the news having shot someone it will be in self-defense after THEY initiated a threat to me or my family.

Sadly today since the "intellectually elite" among us are more interested in scoring political points than in going after those who ACTUALLY committed violent actions or who plot to do so - we have a shift from systematically targeting the environs that produce the HATRED that spawns the violence over to using the government to go after the inanimate objects.

Notice how quickly the operatives in the video above are seen throwing out the HYPOTHETIC regarding what the POLICE would do if BLACK PEOPLE were to show up at a rally with masses of fire arms.  What most would fail to notice is the slight of hand that is at play.   Even Russell Simmons is complicit in the act.   He recognizes the mass carnage that is going on in the streets of the inner city.  However, unlike the "Reconstruction Era South" - he is not calling for an all out coordinated war to eradicate the MENTALITY of HATRED that prompts people to kill.  Indeed he has profited greatly off of "Hip Hop Voice Of The Street Pirate" tunes, even buried a close personal friend (DJ Run) in the process.  For Russell Simmons to go after the "GUNMEN" would be for him to ultimately go after the swamp which he has incubated over the years.  "WHO" killed these people that you reference, Mr Simmons?

The Progressives Maher and Maddow, accompanied by Stockman the "fiscal conservative" are loathed to identify ORGANIC HATRED that is present in the Black community.  Instead they choose to take a regulatory end around to address the problem:  Go after the GUNS.

When we see the "Stop and Frisk" policies that open up the jail cells for Black males to enter in - WHY is it that those same people who promoted the policy are not indicted as the enablers of the "Prison Pipeline"?

When they promote "Gun Control" they have in their mind a business man who has a manufacturing plant, a distribution network and a gun store for retail sales.  They have sinned in that they made the mistake of enabling "our sons to kill each other".

It is my view that "White Supremacy" that is discovered by the ABSENCE of reference of the EQUAL HUMAN BEING of a Black man who has conspired to kill people is the type of clandestine "White Snarling Fox" Supremacy that Malcolm X has talked about.

Until the Black man is returned to the DEFENDER OF HIS COMMUNITY - just as he was made to do so when the Klan forces in Birmingham prompted him to stand up - we will be subject to these schemes - where the Black victim of gun violence is kept SILENCE as the "Superior Shooter" in Tuscon is the agent that made "America care".

I have no respect for the Black political operatives who jumped into the pool and dished ideological and partisan blame against their ideological enemies - that same Saturday before the sun went down.  Yet when it comes to the issue of "Street Pirate On Black Wanton Murder" - they run their PROTECTION RACKET OF SILENCE - because they know that such a crackdown on the assailant would cause them to account for the culture of violence that has been incubated as they departed their battle stations in the community to go fight with their outsourcing partner.   Their "community consciousness" was the commodity that was transacted.