So that I move from "transactional indictment" over to "defining the rule" - the notion specified above says: The prevailing body of thought for the group that you claim as your own indicates a measure of 'correctness'. "We all are not stupid, you know" is the common refrain to those who challenge this prevailing order. If you want to win our favor you should think about moving more in line with our popular thinking. In as much as you stand against it shows you as our enemy."
Since I reject the notion that "Popularity = Effectiveness" I do not accept this "Ideological Unity Enforcement" attempt.
A more effective dogma is to venture to where this ideology that is enforced is most entrenched. These "Mission Accomplished Zones" are a better representation of the EFFICACY of the prevailing ideology. We should note that is it also true that despite the claims to the affirmative - the prevailing elements of the body in question does not always seek to have their permanent interests EFFECTIVELY obtained and expressed. For many UNITY works just fine. In fact the resultant grievances provide them with an opportunity to lead a STRUGGLE, thus they can mandate that their people remain UNIFIED, as asking questions about the leadership and prevailing ideology might cause the ENEMY to "win".
Bill Maher - Bigotry Watch
You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!
"Thought that the bible was mostly bull shit"
Note - I am ONLY talking about those who are self-proclaimed Christians. For all others - please carry on with your starting position in the "Malcolm X Political Football Game". I will come back to you and ask you why Bill Maher's defense of the "Founding Fathers" absent any notation of their "RACISM" flows by without problem while Glenn Beck's reference of them is proof that he is a RACIST.