Cornel West Says Obama Policies Have Racist Effects
Fear not Obama fans - Prof Cornel West does not mean it when he says Obama's policies have a "racist effect" against the interests of Black people. He is merely agitating from the left, hoping to garner the attention of the President. During an interview this past summer Prof West did speak of his anger with Barack Obama for walking up to him at a conference and talking to him like a "school boy" rather than a distinguished member of the "Professional Left". Obama must have taken notes on how to engage with the good professor from Lawrence Summers, a member of Obama's staff that had a similar conflict with Prof West in which he heaped criticism rather than praise upon West.
I take Prof West at his word that his goal is to remain critical of President Obama but to ultimately distinguish himself from the right wing critics of Obama. They are attempting to hurt Obama, making him into a one term president. Back in February 2009 West's friend Michael Eric Dyson had announced to the public that he would vote for Obama in 2012, a month into the President's term.
Fear not people - this is how agitation is done by Black activists now that their "Permanent Friends" that they have worked so doggedly to get into power now sit in the seats of power. Having compromised their "Permanent Interests" long ago they are now simply rustling their feather in a game of respect.
From The Article
Princeton University African-American studies and religion professor Cornel West was asked by Democracy Now! about his reaction to Kanye West's calling George W. Bush a racist, but answered with a response about President Obama. The activist professor said that President Obama's policies, like Bush's, discriminate against African-Americans, with "racist effect and consequence" despite neither President's "racist motivation and intention."
Quite strange that West believes that both president's policies have "harmful racial effects" despite their intentions otherwise YET President Obama has a 91% approval rating amongst Blacks while Bush's approvals steadily remained below 25% and those Blacks got the "side eye" from other Blacks.
What Type Of Policies Would Prof West Deem As "Racially Beneficial"?
I have learned from seeing these type of pronouncements over time that the best method to appraise the veracity of such statements made people Progressive-Fundamentalists who think like Prof West is to reverse the charge and evaluate the policy set that would make them happy.
In the rebuttal of Prof Cornell West, Rick Cohen provides the following words from Prof West as he goes on to defend Obama in the rest of the article:
“He doesn’t care about the Black poor: The evidence is overwhelming! . . . His policies [a]re . . . generating misery among poor people, disproportionately Black and Brown . . . The Obama Administration seems to have very little concern about poor people and their social misery . . . (L)ook at the policies of Black Farmers – a settlement already in place but they don’t want to execute it because they don’t want to be associated with Black folk too explicitly . . . (W)e can go right across the board—look at the policies of the new Jim Crow."
Thus we are lead to believe that the evidence of being "Pro-Black" is to agree to a government payout for the grievances that small Black commercial farmers have against the claimed racism in the distribution of loans from the government. We will put aside the observation that this loan program from the US Dept of Agriculture would have been called "corporate welfare" if received by larger farming entities.
The fact is that the primary means by which President Obama could win the favor of Prof West and other Progressive-Fundamentalists is to erect and defend a massive set of redistributionist policies that functioned to extract wealth away from those who obtained their wealth in the capitalistic market place and shift it to those who are among "the Least of These" - the disadvantaged, the poor, the handicapped, the minority.
In the mind of these elements of the Democratic/Progressive base their vote for President Obama back in 2008 was their part of the "quid pro quo" from which the goods that Prof West is agitating for. It is their belief that Obama used their hopes to get elected but did not follow through. In truth Obama's only sin is that he did not stop them from "painting their own fanciful images" on the "blank canvas" that he presented himself as and thus THEY are the one's who are guilty. If they had any sensibilities about themselves we would see a list that is entitled
"Never, Never, Never Again Will We Allow Ourselves To Have Our Hopes Vicariously Channeled Through A Vehicle That Is Outside Of Our Center Of Gravity". Sadly such a pact would be written during the middle years of Obama's first term but then jettisoned once other elements of their left-wing coalition begin their empassioned advertising campaign against their right-wing enemies starting in the spring of 2012.
The key filter for screening the veracity of certain policy initiatives that I apply today is the question:
Will the adoption of the policies/programs in question lead to a community that has enhanced competencies in support of the community's goals for a higher standard of living?
All too frequently the notion of "competency development" is put aside as the drive for "social justice" rights that are afforded by the mere "membership" in America is driven as the primary indictment.
The truth is that "POOR PEOPLE" are not "Generated". Poverty is the default state of man. Absent a system that generates wealth that can be leveraged for the individual's benefit - a person will remain impoverished. This is a fundamental concept that must be understood and executed upon. Failing to do so will have people contented by the notion that a framework of social entitlements granted upon them and serving as their daily food source is a state of accomplishment. This is not the case.
IF these people are removed from this type of system, or worse - as we see in present day Europe - the system is cut away from them due to insolvency - the people will rue the day that they find themselves without the presence of the system and having failed to develop the competencies that permit them to continue to live at the standard of living that they have become accustomed to per the output of their own productivity.
The Need For Strategic Agricultural Investments Rather Than Civil Rights Payouts
Regarding the government payout to the Black farmers for the liability that was created in the racist distribution of loans in a "last chance" farm assistance program for all who had problems obtaining credit from traditional banking sources I notice the absence of a few key points that could have allowed it to be legitimately branded as a "Pro-Black" victory. We now know that up to 73,000 Black people who were in the farming business will receive upwards of $50,000 each in payment to the alleged racism by the government. They are free to do with this money from the US Treasury as they please.
In the context of the challenges that our community faces notice that the following ideas were never brought up for this $1,250 million dollars
- Urban Farming Research - We hear a lot about the presence of "Food Deserts" where health problems are caused by communities that only have fast food joints but few options for fresh produce for sale in the local stores. If tribute is going to be paid what better target than a strategic payment to fortify the effort to redress this situation?
- Funding For Agricultural & Mechanical Universities - $100 Million to 10 of the key "A&M" colleges so they could fortify their scientific research on how to bring forth the next generation of domestically produced agriculture, cattle and seafoods would have allowed the "grievances" from the past to be projected forward into solutions for the future.
In an interview with Essence Magazine,
Dr John Boyd of the "Black Farmers Association" hints that he plans to return to the "well" and seek another potential $1 billion (a third payout) to insure that all who have been aggrieved receive their money from the government.
Sadly with the activists seeing this as both a "litmus test" on the "Love" of Black people and little consciousness about the points that I have itemized above - we should expect to see the same sort of agitation as the next round comes about. Any President at that time who resists will be said to have "racist effects" upon Black people. They will counter that the Black farmers should receive the money AND the programs that have been listed above should be funded.