Failed Leftist Economic & Academic Theory At The Local Levels Drive The Quest For National Socialistic Policies To Cover Their Failures

Republicans, Religion and Racial Profiling By MIKE SECCOMBE

 The article linked above argues that America, driven by the racists in the Republican party are the cause of the desperate condition of Black people living in the hollowed out, rotten core of our cities in America.  These Black people are made vulnerable to criminal activity and even outreach by Muslim radical organizations because of their desperation.  This being the same as is the case among otherwise educated young Muslim men who upon seeing the condition of their people choose to join groups like Al Queda.

Please bookmark this as one of the best cases of transference and indictment upon a more popular target in order to retain cover for the real guilty party.

You see - when we are treated to this type of propaganda rarely to never do we ever see the author detail the fact that in these inner city areas the people have elected "favorable representatives" to control the official and social institutions.  The promises that were made got them elected but today's results show  how empty these promises were.

Those of us who are willing to take a more dispassionate view of the situation are forced to conclude - as the next section heading says...................................

Despite Having Promoted The Suite Of Popular Theories Over The Political District In Question The Prevailing Powers Have Failed To Deploy The People As Workers In Support Of Their Own Community Interests

I have stated many times before - "Progressivism is INORGANIC"!!   It is a protest movement.  A permanent struggle against some external force.  It works to re-engineer that force which is said to be oppressing the people as it works for a more common good.

The main flaw of progressivism is that when it slips up and gains prevailing control over a given boundary it does not turn inward at the sight of the Pacific ocean.  Instead its nature dictates that it find a new land bridge so that it can continue its expansionist struggle. 

How is it that with the combination of its economic theories (quasi-socialist), its theories about social control (anti-central authority) it can't manage to turn away from its indictment against the corporate powers that have practiced "corporate abandonment" or if they are in place - their worker oppression and instead express progressivism's notions of "PEOPLE over profit".......................UPON THE BACKS OF THE ACTUAL PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES WHO WOULD BENEFIT from the theory?  

You see - that phrase is reserved for corporations and government tax & redistribution policies, meant to tell the rich man to stop being so selfish.   Missed is the opportunity for quasi-socialism to be applied upon the backs of "the least of these", compelling them to employ their services for benefit of the community and that the payment they receive is as such.

The reason why this doesn't work as a means of compelling the people who are most desperate is because it is only meant as an indictment and nothing more. 

How does it feel, progressives, to realize that despite the ravenous cheers that you have expressed in taking down or muffling right-wing/conservative movements, forcing them to evolve - you still have not used the land that you control as "model homes" for what your theories can do for the masses, if allowed to expand?

The Failure To Manage The Key Human Resources Toward A Directed End

Though I am a conservative I am at least willing to admit that right and left ultimately need each other in order to come up with a proper balance.

Those core foundational beliefs which are seen in the social control that is attempted by those who seek to retain certain traditions are ultimately the strictures that will need to be in place to morph "the least of these" into full and equal human beings in society per their competencies which afford them employment and the burden that society puts upon them to uphold the standards just as everyone else is expected.

The challenge for the progressive is to decide if he wishes to continue to utilize the "inferiorities" of "the least of these" as his main indictment against the nation, with the hopes of obtaining more external resources for him to live at a certain standard OR if he seeks to deploy more effective human resource management principles as he partitions up the geography and expects all of these areas to practice good governance in pursuit of this desired development. 

The oxymoron of seeking to nationalize the mandate for an equal living standard so that the resulting equal access to resources can be had by those who have been shut out, thus allowing them to grow toward independent competency after the biases have been removed is patently ridiculous.    It is only done for the same of power aggregation, playing upon the people's hopes.


How does one grow in strength unless the muscles that they will later use to stand fully erect are not exercised? 

The inner city dwellers captured in this article are victims of being pawns in the game.  In m book the chess player that has more of  these chess pieces on his side of the board - representing his power over them - is the more guilty for failing to transform them as promised.