Understanding The "White Male Paternalism" And The Black "Co-Hosts" That Are Expected To "Put Them In Check"

You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!

I monitor certain media artifacts of interest in order to gain a more clear understanding and dynamics that are contained within.

I have recently started recording "The 700 Show". The dual purpose of hearing a Christian message of hope but also to understand Pat Roberts. There is no doubt that the man has said some kooky things over the years that have justifiably drawn scrutiny to him. At the same time his show is filled with the good works that the organization has done in regards to the fund raising efforts and application of directed assistance in the lives of targeted people.

Of course when it comes to most Black people the de facto ideological and political positions of Rev Roberts causes them to question the rationality of any Black person who would dare co-host a show with "a man like this".

You probably do not have the Flash Player (Get Adobe Flash Player Here) installed for your browser or the video files are misplaced on your server!

Such is the case with the Black female in the video above - Kristi Watts
(Note: As I went out to Google to confirm the spelling of her name I found several hate filled references to her choice to "cavort with the enemy of Black people". I hold hope for the day that these people will call out Black people for making appearances with "Hip Hop Voice Of The Street Pirate" entertainers just as well. They, unlike Rev Roberts have called for the death of any Black man that steps to them.  I know of no Black person that has been murdered and the killer was found to have a CD changer full of audio recordings from Pat Roberts.  But I digress:

Here is what I saw:

• Skeptical Brother: Kristi Watts: Pat Robertson's Personal Slave Girl
• We See You: Kristi Watts House Negro 
• The Black Informant: Kristi Watts Tells Her Story (Note the posts from the respondents )

Long story short - the White Conservative male is the enemy of Black people as he is a racist.  White  Liberal Snarling Foxes such as Ted Kenney or Keith Olbermann have escaped beyond their genetic propensity to perpetuate their recessive gene that produces skin color and they truly wish to see Black people become equal in all ways and thus have a society and world where the White culture no longer is the dominate force that shapes the framework.

Yeah sure.

I keep telling people that they need to not only consider the overt assaults upon their interests that they take "conservative policies" to be with respect to Black people and ALSO consider if these White Liberal Racist Snaring Fox Policies build up any particular COMPETENCIES within Black people.  In most cases the answer is not just "NO".  Its "HELL NO".  They don't want Negroes to the point of rioting.  Instead a well fed person that is lulled into using their currency of the vote to initiate the ideological priorities of the Snarling Fox is just fine.  Just look forward 50 years from now and consider your capability to leave and take your skills and competencies that you have developed under this system to other places in the diaspora.  You will find that the biggest fear in life beyond the White Republican is finding yourself DETACHED from the supply of nutrients that the stomach lining that the "belly of the beast" provides to you.

Long story short "Progressive Leftist Dogma" is an ANTI-BLACK COMMUNITY COMPETENCY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY.  You can print this as my words that document my observations.
Their goal is to insure that we are FED, not that we ever have the ability to raise our own crops.  Sadly many Negroes have bought into this strategy.

I say this without one ounce of radical hatred.

Pat Robertson

Pat Robertson and Bill O'Reilly and Bill Bennett represent the image and viewpoint of the White male paternalist.  This is what rubs so many Black people wrong about them.

With respect to Pat Roberts I have focused in on the relationship between he and Terry Meeuwsen to establish a baseline of understanding of the relationship between Roberts and Watt.

In summary Pat Robertson is configured as the wise old sage and the final authority on the show.  Questions are teed up to him on a number of different subjects.  First his female partner gets a crack at an answer and then Robertson gives his.  Indeed when I have heard Robertson give some fundamentalist, old school answer with respect to women's issues Ms Meeuwsen expresses her slight disagreement but effectively bites her tongue, not wanting to confound the sage and get into deep debate as the show keeps moving to the next segment.

This same "tongue biting" that is seen between the male/female dynamic of power on the show is also what Kristi Watt is bound to.  The key difference is that with Ms Watt there is a multidimensional matrix as her RACE is thrown into the mix.

Those who express frustrations that the both of the female hosts have not "jumped into Robertson's mug" and told him off regarding the gender norms of the day are also looking to Kriti Watt - the Black representative to do the same with everything on race.

Recall a few weeks ago on the "O'Reilly Factor" Bill O'Reilly jokingly said to Dr Marc Lamont Hill "you look like a drug dealer".   Dr Hill took the words in and immediately fired back "Well you look like a drug user".  I applaud Dr Hill for his wit at handling the volley.  "A+" he deserves.

It is when we extend the jousting between O'Reilly and his "liberal guests" to other relationships such as how he rousts Alan Combs or Ellis Henican that we see that what is taken as a racial offense when a Black man like Hill is on the receiving end is also passed off for mere joking when done with the list of White liberal males and females that O'Reilly seeks to keep off balance.

In summary both Watts and Hill are expected to "represent the Black race" against the White Paternalist who's lair they enter into.  Failing to retain an adversarial disposition, keeping the angry face on has one risk being called a "House Negro", an "Uncle Tom" or the myriad of other hateful words that White Racists used to call Black people but have since been adopted by Black liberals - the portion of which that are filled with hatred and intolerance.

Engagement

I do agree that the "minority" co-hosts (gender or racial) that are put up against the White Male Patriarch should work to force this White male into intellectual debate, having them to justify their positions.

Intelligent debate between two equal human beings is a superior means of changing stuck minds that is the tactic of "cursing them out" or walking off of the show because you choose to have nothing to do with a bigot.  Not all bigots have burned down your house and assaulted you.  Most assuredly many individuals who have assaulted the interests of Black people yet who have the "right" ideology are allowed to remain huddled under the veil of Black Progressive protectionism.

At the same time we have to also admit that the Black Community is in need of a "framework" that is fielded and to which "sage leaders" are seen as keepers of the stone.  So much of our recent history has been one of necessary opposition to the White Supremacy that has injured us for its own use.  As these actions become more regulated and our people are forced to rediscover ourselves we will see the need for a system that must be enforced despite the perpetual progressive desires to rebel against it for the sake of change.  Some people's desire to "debate" certain issues is motivated by their intentions of removing the cultural strictures that bear down upon their own special interests without concern about how this dismantlement will open up other societal ills.

At the end of fighting against the "Great White Father", failing to field their own system of regulation of the human resources will leave them with a society that looks strangely like the "Isle Of Dr Moreau"

After struggling so hard to be FREE of their Oppressor they soon find that they failed all along to develop their own governance and resource allocation strategy.  In the chaos that ensues as the common enemy that united them is taken down and his neck cut the "free beings" turn on themselves killing each other.




They failed to develop ORGANIC COMPETENCIES as the centerpiece of their struggle against their oppressors.