Self-Inspection: Is My Own Focus On Black Establishment Organizations The Same As "Democrats Who Are Black's" Focus On Conservatives?

Self-Inspection: Is My Own Focus On Black Establishment Organizations The Same As "Democrats Who Are Black's" Focus On Conservatives?

(Note: Couldn't find a good picture of a sista doing an exam.  :-)  )

As I monitor the subject matter on a select few "BQPFRC" blog sites in order to determine their character and their focus there is no doubt that the absolute majority of their list of "enemies of Black folks" reside EXTERNALLY to our inner circle.   If I were to provide a blanket name for their efforts it would be "WITHOUT The Black Community".   They see themselves as exposing the harmful policy effects and mean-spiritedness of the POPULARLY healed enemies of Black people.

Their primary goal is indeed "Black Unity".  As long as Black folks are UNIFIED behind the ideological and focus of their choosing it is they who retain their power over our community.

In as much as they confuse unity/popularity with EFFECTIVENESS they justify their continued operations by noting the large number of Black people that congregate with them.   Ironically - the fact that there is also continued problems and grievances about these unified masses - further justifies their need to KEEP STRUGGLING, the enemy's power has not abated.

Through every checkpoint where they have obtained more political power for their ideology instead of this organization looking at transparent measure of the material advancements they will either unify their talking points around marginal gains OR will point to the acquisition of the seats of power as proof in and of itself that they are making forward progress.  (Note:  Barack Obama's presidential win in and of itself was a "Mission Accomplished" moment to them even before he lifted a pen to sign legislation.  18 months later despite having 15.4% Black unemployment rate and a cadre of other problems WITHIN the Black community that were there before he arrived at the White House but while his machine was dominating the local institutions - they STILL can proclaim that a revolution for the advancement of Black American interests has taken place over the past 18 months.   When you deal with a person who is not willing to contract into a set of OPEN AND TRANSPARENT measures of progress one should not be surprised about what they find hope in nor should you be surprised that they are still grieving despite their self-stimulated 'good tidings')

BUT WHAT ABOUT ME?

If someone was to script my focus the top 5 list would be:

1. Street Pirates that assault the community 
2. Favorable political leaders and Actorvists that are in power yet the organizations are still incompetent - The Progressive Cities list
3. Black Establishment Organizations (10 P's In The Progressive Black Establishment Pod) who have changed their protest behavior now that these favorable people are in power over the seats that they used to protest against - and/or they are fighting amongst themselves now that the unifying enemy has departed
4. The large gap between the CLAIMS that education for Black kids is the game changer and how much the human resource management efforts from the adults that have proximate responsibility substantiate this priority
5. The Black Flight Progressive who shows that he prefers the environment that the management of his IDEOLOGICAL ADVERSARY expresses to the world per his choice to relocate away from the areas where his preferred Progressive ideology is the "last man standing".  All the while his voting behavior in his new locale proves to be an effort to customize the conservative order that he favored into the progressive policy set that he had departed.  He is thus a 'permanent struggler', requiring his adversary to fight against yet proving my observation that "Progressivism Is Not An Organic Ideology", but instead an opposition dogma against an establishment order.  The "Black Flight Progressive" never has to accept the management order that is able to express his "permanent interests" as a Black person per his vote.  The truth is that his "vote" was expressed when the U-Haul Truck pulled into the driveway of his former residence.

This is an accurate listing of the priorities of my focus on this blog.  (Now go ask my friend Filled Negro to do a similar listing.  I assure that 4 out of 5 would be external).

I ask you to make measure of the character of my list.

Am I being unfair to expect that as the Black Community rank & file has given its support behind this methodology (progressivism) that we were told would bring forth our racial best interests that I would go out and test the efficacy of these claims?  In my mind I believe that those who fail to distance themselves from a "Black mayor" so that she can be appraised transparently for the actual advancement of the community interests is a person who is tacitly supporting the INFERIORITY of the present office holder.  

Worse yet the purported "racial cover" that is delivered in the name of support for "our guy" squanders the opportunity to construct an effective management dogma in which the METHODOLOGIES by which the Black Permanent Interests are made malleable while the desire to attain them remain fixed.  Conversely those who remain steadfast upon their ideological pathway that is intended to obtain these interests don't allow the FAILURE to move toward these interests to cause them to reconsider their methodologies.

Long story short - they are more interested in retaining UNITY around their dogma than they are in actually documenting their arrival at their promised land.  They stand within a land fill of promises unfulfilled.

The evidence that they are ideological more than they are "Black protectionists" can easily be exposed by considering how they attack Black officials who "don't think the right way".   The sin of this Black official is that the veil of protectionism is stripped off of him.  Black haters give the queue to the White Liberal Snarling Foxes that this is a "Free Range Black" - the season is open upon him for attacks that they would not dare to hurl upon a "made man".  They fail to see that with the concept of Blackness lowered to be one of "Black AND Liberal" no one need respect their demands for diversity - a White LIBERAL can effectively communicate the platform of the "Progressive Who Is Black".   Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a perfect example of this.

My efforts to expose this racket wins me no friends.  It is indeed a racket as increasingly certain individuals take their mask off and no longer even attempt to front about who they are and what they are really after.

Hold Us Both Accountable Under A Common Regulatory Regime

I have no problem admitting my right of center orientation and corporatist way of thinking per my professional experience.  It is my opinion that people who seek to achieve a goal via the guise of a corporation are little different than those who achieve to accomplish some end as a community, an organization or an interest group. 

It also stands to reason that the general governance discipline that works for a corporation can be applied to a special interest group - even if their goal is to advance their community and these advancements are represented as "racial advancement".

Failure to adopt certain discipline means that the masses are left  to the whims of the "confidence men" that hold sway over them.  Take a desperate people who see prosperity on the other side and are frustrated at the color of their own turf.  There is a high likelihood that these people will be accepting of those who bring awareness of this gap but also these are the people who have a high likelihood of failure to note the processes by which these other lots of land were managed.  

I ask that my theories be scrutinized just as others be brought to scrutiny.  At the same time those theories that are operating within our community deserve far more inspection.   Today in the wake of acknowledgement that (as the campaign poster in a poor section of Atlanta said) "We have a lot more work to do" those who stand against me ask "Well how would YOUR theories have done any better had they been in place"?   I find this to be the most intellectually dishonest question that gets bantered around in Black political discourse.

After marketing to us an affirmative prescription on how our problems could be solved they are allowed to distance themselves from inspection of how they lead us to this place and "put me on trial", demanding that I convince them that my way would have proved to be a fix.

Despite the question - they have no intention what so ever to stop taking their pharmacological concoction.  Thus the need for  a transparent overlay over the Black Community's operations that strip away the power of those who stand within our "Racial Consciousness Nucleus", working as agents for their own interests.  

This core consciousness must be protected from contamination as such.