What a surprise. The New York Times has found yet another angle of attack upon the South. In fact they used the case of a White killer who was convicted of murder by a jury made up of 11 Whites and 1 Black. Even White killers have caught onto the practice of "Expanding The Police Tape Away From The Murder Scene" and thus "Putting The System On Trial". Justice Thurgood Marshall must be proud at what he has wrought. In this day this practice is now color blind.
I will not execute the standard defense of the practice which allows the prosecutor and defense attorney to apply their right to "peremptory challenge", striking 3 jurors each in order to gain favor for their particular cause. This would be a conviction for the prosecutor and a finding of innocent for the defense attorney.
Ironically while the New York Times seeks to dismiss racial profiling they also note:
Studies have shown that racially diverse juries deliberate longer, consider a wider variety of perspectives and make fewer factual errors than all-white juries, and that predominantly black juries are less likely to impose the death penalty.
On this blog I frequently note the damage to the Black community that is engendered once certain operatives have us talking more about "politics" and political maneuvering more than they care to talk about the aggregate results upon the core community that they purport to be working on behalf of. Left unchecked these operatives get caught up into the machinations of their agenda, having lost total sight of their permanent interests - the community.
I find that the issue of "left wing justice" in the courts takes on a similar dimension. Those who practice the axiom: "it is better to have 10 guilty men go free than to have 1 innocent man be incarcerated" is in full effect. Unfortunately these abstract theorists never seem to take ownership of the "wilding" attacks that these 10 rouge individuals that they have let free back into their community are doing. Instead we are likely to hear some project by which the society as a whole is indicted for these "10 guilty men who are now free" acting as they do.
The only way to counter "left-wing injustice" and force the New York Times and others to remain at the "murder scene" and not cherry pick is to charge us all with fielding a set of policies that produce a favorable societal outcome:
The Permanent Interests Of Safe Streets - So that our people can congregate together and build up a social fabric without fear of each other.
In the world of balanced outcomes the New York Times would be forced to temper their muckraking with reporting upon the massive "Civil Rights Violations" that occur on the streets where "Justice Thurgood Marshall Justice" is practiced. They would begin to make note that the Northeast and Midwest today has produced the same "killing fields" for Black people that had been a cause for action in the past when Black people were being systematically murdered and yet the intimidation tactic now known as "Stop Snitching" was employed by racist Whites who also sought to control the outcomes of the justice system.
I refuse to "bite" upon the carrot that the New York Times is dangling in this case.
They pretend that "race based" profiling is a grand indictment yet they search for judges and juries that have "empathy". This force of empathy inserts just enough "jury nullification" to tip the scales in their grand struggle between "the big guy and the little guy".
For our community today the "big guy" has cleared out in so many cases and we now have a series of attacks between "little guys" with no power who's actions we must adjudicate. Failing to do so - our communities will remain in chaos.
0 comments:
Post a Comment