This is not a statement of victimization from me. Instead you should see this as yet another piece of evidence that I am bringing forth as part of the "trial" that I plan to initiate.
It is all too clear that when the enemies of the Black Establishment (and by extension the Democrats) have a series of damning indictments against them those who PURPORT to be representing the best interests of the Black community seem more capable in "connecting the dots". They tell of the wisdom of the Black voter in his knowledge of who has his own "best interests in mind" and thus the high rate of Black support is merely an instantiation of this knowledge.
When it comes to Monica Conyers, Kwame Kilpatrick, William Jefferson, John Edwards, Larry Langford, Shelia Dixon and many others - the pattern that these dots create don't seem to be quite as clear.
Worst of all there is far more of a damning link between the corruption and incompetence shown by these people in question and the key interests of the Black community. This is because these people have been promoted to govern the key institutions from which the Black community receive their civic services from.
If the theory is true that your ideological and partisan adversaries are scoundrels and thus the Black community does not support them.....what should be said against those who have been entrusted to represent the community's interests and are later found to have taken advantage of it? Knives seems to be more damaging when they are used upclose and personal.
For some reason the entire machine from which these operatives flow from never seem to receive aggregate damage as a result.
0 comments:
Post a Comment