Thursday, March 18, 2010

The US Census Speaks Volumes About One's Ideological View Of Government

Last week I got a letter warning me that the 2010 US Census would be coming to my house very soon.

Yesterday I received the envelope containing the census

Today I filled out the form.

I made several notable observations about the forms and the entire process along the way.



Note the envelope that the Census came in, pictured above.   It says "Your Response Is Required By Law".  This sounds like something close to a mandate to me.

When one violates the law there is typically some punitive response that is carried out by the government.  The hope is that such a rebuke will dissuade this action in the future.

When it comes to the US Census, however, this same government actually spends money on extra resources to chase down people who "violate" this mandate to fill out the form.

Now granted - some people never receive the form.  They have moved to a new address, others are unemancipated minors and still others are incapacitated in some way and thus will never see the form unless an adult brings it to their awareness and records their presence.  I get it.  There are one thousand and one different ways to fall through the cracks.

Furthermore the US Census has the goal of achieving an accurate count of the human beings inside of our borders.  It is not meant to judge or be punitive.  I get this as well.




One has to admit, however, that there is a gross bit of irony in this entire system of assumptions.  In addition to being pushed as an accurate head count the US Census is being sold as the gateway to more federal resources sent into your community and a ticket to more political representation in the various legislative bodies at each tier of government.  (The letter to the left that is packaged with the Census form tells of these benefits as well).


Despite the sales job on the benefits as an enticement to comply with the law mandating the completion of the documents, certain activist groups are driven to participate in the census process to maximize their own returns.  They see the census in the context of their  political and social best interest to ensure that all heads where they live are counted.    I expect to see either Jesse Jackson or Rep John Lewis doing a radio ad reminding Black folks that we were once counted as "3/5ths of a human being in the past....lets not allow them to disrespect us today by having them not count us at all".  Then again - I have hope.  With Obama in office the power of "They" (as in "Da man") gets diminished a bit as a bad guy who will have us back in slavery if we are not vigilant.

Once again my own ideology conflicts with the prevailing thoughts around this entire issue. At what point do we demand that otherwise competent adults, who are being bombarded with awareness messages will themselves be prompted to do what is expected of them AND......in the event of an exception (ie: they did not obtain their form) - they actively reach out because they have bought into the importance of being counted?

Furthermore a community that has organic productive capacities after they have arranged their "human resources" toward this end would be far more inclined to protect their storehouses from being raided under the guise of the "national societal contract" to which the US Census fills in the variable of headcount, thus arranging the reapportionment.  To be clear I am not against reapportionment.  My model of what the federal government should be doing in the way of resource distribution is vastly different than my progressive counterparts.

I am far more inclined to make note of the dominate control that they now have over the local institutions and ask "Why, despite this control that you have amassed, are you still among 'the least of these'?  What about your strategy are you willing to jettison now that you have gained power via the quid pro quo of promised benefit.  Now you use your entrenchment to seek even more power at the national level, never having been forced to enumerate the grand benefits received at the lower plateaus of the mountain that you now control". 


Filling Out The Form

Here is the meat of the form.

I was actually surprised by the simplicity of the form.  This time they only ask about the people in the house and some brief questions about the ownership of the residence.  That was it.

I seriously looked back in the envelope to verify that I did not miss the second page where they asked me about my microwave, color TV, computer and Internet connections.  None of that was asked this time.



The Prisoner Head Count and the "Negro" Checkbox

There it is folks.  Clear instructions.  If "Skibop" is presently up state, housed in a State Department of Corrections facility - do not count him on your form.  He did something that was against his own community's code of conduct and thus his head was lost to the community that he has assailed.  He does have until April 1, 2010 to be released for him to have paid his dues to society and thus can be enumerated in with his community.






Next we have the contentious label of "Black, African Am., or Negro"

It didn't bother me.  I know who I am.
I understand what they wanted me to put on the form.







It was question #8 that I didn't quite understand.  They saw fit to add more granularity to the term "Hispanic":
  • Not Hispanic
  • Mexican
  • Puerto Rican
  • Cuban
  • Another Hispanic - Write In What It Is
Why not this same thing for Blacks, African-Americans and Negroes?


We are:
  • Original Blacks, Slavery Descendants
  • Caribbean Blacks
  • African Blacks
  • South American Blacks
If there is country of origin denotation for the term "Hispanic" - why is it that no such delineation was made for Blacks?

There's that "prison" checkoff again.  They seek to understand why a person who did not live most of the year in the residence did not live there.   "Prison" was one of these reasons why.



The final observation is that the form only had room for 12 people in one house.  I wonder if they make special provisions for people in Utah where certain practices have them exceeding this head count.

I also noticed that beyond person #6 they don't care what race you are.

3 comments:

Olive said...

The modern-day census is the brainchild of the White Marxist elite liberal intelligensia who need to separate people into different factions for better control. Notice how they kow-tow to Black Americans, bending over backwards to not offend by offering all forms of description and yet offending anyway ... White Americans, as diverse as they are (Northern Europe, Eastern Europe, Southern Europe, North Africa, Middle East, Asia) are given only one descriptive word. Whether they came over with the Mayflower, the consecutive immigration floods fleeing poverty or persecution, or more recently, or whether their skin is the palest of ecru, the lightest of pink, or darkest olive to light brown, they aren't interested in them. Unless they are a White "Hispanic." Now Hispanics and Asians ... these are the fastest growing segments of our population, so our Socialist Overlords really want to know the details. I am surprised there isn't a special check box for Jews, aren't they considered a different "race" by some?

I like reading your blog. It is a voice of common sense and sanity in an unsane, emotion-driven and responsibility-deflecting world. But you do your best work on the "Filled Negro" blog, where you sharpen your sword and expose the lies and misconceptions. No one on that blog has successfully debated with you and won. Thank you for your diligence to speak the truth that you see despite the slandering of the ignorant and the downright malicious.

Anonymous said...

Plenty of Black Central Americans as well (Belizeans, Nicaraguans, Costa Ricans, Panamanians, Hondurians).

And alot of them live here in the US mainland. What about Dominicans? Must of them in the US Black as well...I smell a undercount.

Constructive Feedback said...

Olivia:

Thanks but here is the deal.

I am not even trying to "win a debate" with them.

I am seeking to get ALL OF US to be bound to a set of transparent principles. (I won't bother to list them because you know what they are).

Ironically the best way to chip away at their argument is to force them to remain focused upon where their power is most concentrated: in their own communities.

Instead of being able to leverage this space as their showcase of success - they leverage the continued grievances in this zone for continued unity and struggle.

The Census is their tool for demanding MORE RESOURCES from the centralized state that they are building.

Those who are productive have the opposing ideological position. They want to grow more representatives in order to keep the confiscators from taking their money. (Sadly the latest crop of Republicans are not "fiscal conservatives". They instead have a hearty appetite for spending. They merely spend on different things than does the progressive)