Recall when I pointed out that the news media last year kept asking the question of White people: "Will White people choice to vote their interests over their race and thus vote for Barack Obama?". This was the persistent question but they never asked "The Next Logical Question":
If 96% of all Black voters vote for "The Black Guy" is this not "racist"/"racialist" (a more accurate term) just the same?
If White people vote against someone because of racial hatred and thus this explains the majority White concentration of the Republican Party (all White Democrats having jettisoned their racism) then why is it that no one makes the next logical step and inspect WHY, despite having every single institution that presides over the Black community being controlled by Democrats AND the grievances about these institutions remaining do BLACK PEOPLE CONTINUE TO "Bypass Local Democrats and hold National Republicans accountable"? The Black voter, regardless of how bad or effective the Republican legislator is - is a solid vote for his ouster. A Democrat who is a good politician will motivate the Black vote to turn out in record numbers. A poor Democratic politician will likewise have a suppressive effect.
WHERE WAS THE INTELLECTUAL CURIOSITY OF THE WASHINGTON POST?
I stated many times before: I have no means of forcing my people to change their thoughts and, in some cases their ideological bigotry.
The only thing that I can do and care to do is to validate their entrenched position per a framework that has more transparence than what they have as their opinions.
The distilled essense of the White Supremacist is:
- He uses Physical Terrorism to keep Black people in our place
- He denies us Quality Education so that we don't have the skills to order our way forward
- He destroyes our Business Enterprise so that we will never tap into our productive talents
- He injects us with infectious solutions so that we might Die And Early Death
As some unknown thousands of "White Supremacists" descened upon Washington DC in the same space of a far smaller group of Black people attending a Black Family Reunion gathering - we should expect to see some of the elements of the White supremacists displayed to show the Black people who were gathered that they need to "Get Back Into Their Place".
As I scoured the newspapers of Washington DC and neighborhing Baltimore MD I did not find a torid list of Black people who had been beaten and murdered by the "White Supremacist" Tea Party attendeeds. Sadly the only people who were murdered or assaulted in these two cities seemed to be victims of the usual background static of assaults and murder that can be found in either of these two cities on "Any Given Weekend".
The primary reason why I keep throwing up the unchecked violent crime situation as a means of counter-checking the "Ideological Bigots" is because they want desperately to CONTROL THE BLACK AGENDA. If they can keep our people focused upon the issues that are advantageous to their own ideologically leanings they believe that in UNITY among our people they will ultimately win.
I have learned that we as a people cannot allow these operatives to cherry pick that which plays to their strengths (ie: victimization) and instead they must be evaluated upon their ability to deliver upon the entire solution set.
The call of RACISM has devolved into a political weapon used to suppress opposition and intimidate people. Actress and "Air America" agent Janeane Garofalo was the first White person of note to drive home the tactic of claiming that criticism of Obama is racist. They realize that if they can put Obama critics in check under the specter of racism that their valid criticisms of his policies will be debilitated by the cloud that they have painted over the critic's head. The benefit of the left is that their numerous, hate-filled protests against the immediate post president and the 42 White men prior to him were never deeded "racist".
The news media is lazy. From opinion polls to these type of 'man on the street' interviews that lead to this article - it is time for the news organizations who pride themselves for their objectivity to "As The Next Question".
Compare how "White Supremacists" acted over history and ask those who label them as such to provide more evidence than just their opinion to substantiate their claims.
Sadly too many people would rather have someone who agrees with them but, when challenged, could not fully articulate their position than to have a person that disagrees with them and could fully articulate why.
I pride myself in doing the latter and telling the other person WHY they are "strategically wrong" and not just that they are "wrong".