Monday, August 10, 2009

The "Racism Chaser" Is Himself Motivted By Hatred


Racism is the belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race.



Sit back and observe the "Racism Chaser" and one thing becomes clear. They HATE their opponents just as much as they say their opponents hate them. In their case, however, they say their hatred of these others is justified because these other "haters" initiated the "hate". Theirs is but a secondary or residual hatred. As they see it "defensive hatred" is done for self protective purposes only. I wish this was so.

What is a "Racism Chaser"? A racism chaser is an operative who sees "Racist White people under every rock". In fact he himself is a "Racial Profiler". Any action done by a White person.....excuse me......a CONSERVATIVE White Person is viewed with skepticism and in the context of this conservative White's purported racially hate filled thoughts and or the "thoughts and actions" of other Whites who are known to have similar thoughts. Keep in mind that even if there is no specific violent action that they themselves can point to as having suffered from their target group it is the group's PROFILE as built up from the past that can still justify their own present sentiment against them. Indeed they are against profiling as a bigoted form of stereotyping and discrimination. Just when they are the subject of the profile.

A "Racism Chaser", above all is a "Mall Cop". A mall cop is defined as a person who is so bigoted and entrenched in his own view that a shopper that fits a certain profile is prone to theft that he is prone to steal again. The "mall cop" keeps his eyes focused upon this suspect. All the while he is focused on this one character, the valuables that the Mall Cop was hired to protect is being stolen by another being who does not meet their profile. His bigotry is so strong that he is likely to see the real shop lifter with a hand full of goods, smile at him and then hold the door open because both hands are full of goods. These goods are stolen but the "Mall Cop" is oblivious to this.

Such is the case when it comes to the "Racism Chaser". The racism chaser fails to note his "Permanent Interests" and thus focus every single one of his efforts on protecting it as much. When it comes to the permanent interest of "Safe Streets", for example - the murder of a Black person by another Black does not rise to the same "murderous intent" as when a White person or a Police man kills another Black. They will say that the history of the White man's terror upon the Black and the RESPONSIBILITY that the police officer has makes their murder of a Black man a more significant event than the Black on Black murder. The racism chaser fails to see that with this statement he has inferiorized the Black killer. Despite having committed the same deadly act his act will NEVER be as deadly as the acts of these other two. I have yet to determine the formula that documents the equal worth between the number of Black people who must be murdered in Black on Black homicide to equal the response made by the "Racism Chasers" in response to ONE White man or one Police man that has killed a Black. Again - despite the fact that any murder of a Black violates the permanent interests of "Safe Streets" - the bigoted Racism Chaser has the value of the murdered Black person's life keyed in upon his KILLER.

When a Black person is killed by another Black - this is "Just another Nigger who has gotten himself KILLED on the streets".

Since there is no other political advantage in pursuing this Black killer - the grieving family is just "out of luck".

In summary "The Racism Chaser, above all is a POLITICAL OPERATIVE".

If you think that his interests reside in the best interests of the Black Community - you'd be sadly mistaken. One need only look at where he is most dominate to then do a query for the sight of the "Black Best Interests" in full view. One will see a very unbalanced and unimpressive set of evidence to bear out his claims.

Above all the racism chaser is a "PROGRESSIVE OPERATIVE".

His ultimate goal is to attack "Conservative" or "Republican" interests. By promoting the image that CONSERVATIVE = REPUBLICAN = RACIST his mission is accomplished. As issues are debated in our society - with the PROFILE of their "real" racist intentions of the conservative - everything else that they do is suspect. It is framed under the prism of "racism".

The "Racism Chaser" who has a history of seeking to punish White folks who are in the public arena for doing or saying something that all might agree is "racist" has recently shown that he can punish a conservative White person for calling someone else a "racist". This White conservative was not charged with DOING something that was "racist". Instead this was simply another opportunity for this hate filled group of "racism chasers" to suppress free speech and to exert punishment upon their ideological enemies, of course for some greater political gain. Just imagine if the penalty for false or misplaced charges of racism (which was the case in my view in this incident with conservative Glen Beck) was an attack upon one's sponsors or donors - in the case of various civil rights organizations? Most assuredly they'd be put out of business. Their opponents would smile as a result.

The rest of us remain puzzled as to why they don't express such lust for the counter-attack against offensive words spoken in the public space when it comes to ignorance, death threats and assault upon Black women as heard in the subset of Hip Hop music that should be labeled "Sambo Hip Hop"? Clearly the "White Conservative media figure" is superior to anything that the Black hip hop artist can say to offend them. This despite the greater quality of offense heard in Hip Hop. Do you notice the pattern shared with their silence about Black on Black homicide?


WHAT OF THE WHITE LIBERAL?

The Racism Chaser would like to believe that "White Supremacy" has a bound by ideology rather than by the color of skin. A White person who is a progressive is an enlightened figure. He wants the Black American or African to have an equal shot at being an EQUAL HUMAN BEING in this world that seeks to derail his interests and subvert him - or so the Racism Chaser convinces himself that this is the case.

In truth - the key difference between the White Liberal and the White Conservative is defined by what he is willing to GIVE THE NEGRO as part of his bargaining process. I have stated previously that a significant portion of the Black population does not mind positioning themselves as "inferior" or "damaged goods". This is the case as long as our inferiority is a result of "the legacy of racism" AND as long as we are queued up to receive some special entitlement because of it - such a conditioned Black is willing to "assume the pose" for the sake of receiving such benefit.

The White Liberal - is no less of a racist as the White Conservative. Again a "racist" being defined as the assumption that one's genetic make up renders one inferior to that of their own kind. The key difference is that the White Liberal knows that he can obtain some political advantage by providing resources to the "damaged Negro" and the Negro will be thankful that someone is helping him and "feeling his pain".

I implore everyone to read the judicial opinions of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg, White Liberal and former ACLU attorney on matters of race. In the recent "Ricci vs New Haven" ruling she points to a previous Supreme Court ruling in favor of aggrieved Black employees at a power utility company. It seems that the utility company decided to raise the education standard for all internal promotions. That "discriminatory" action, in the eyes of Justice Ginsberg was to require a HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA for consideration of this higher position. The "racism" stemmed from the fact that while 34% of the Whites had a high school diploma, only 12% of the Blacks had one. This is the source of the "disparate impact" that many pride themselves upon.

In this case a Black person is NOT ALLOWED to apply his own values as it relates to his own valuation of a HIGH SCHOOL diploma. Despite the fact that we have several initiatives to address the school drop out problem that plagues our community, despite all of the warnings that we provide to our own people about the value of this document which notates the ACCOMPLISHMENT in academics - any attempt to have "punitive results" for the lack of a diploma absent agreement from the Black community that this will be the new standard - is seen as an assault upon Blacks by the White establishment. The functional result of this type of paternalism is that a gross misalignment between the progressive drive that we as a people promote among our people AND the "social justice" actions that are being used to LOWER the standards as a means of accommodating "the Blacks". This ruling which codifies the inferior standing of Black people now serves as a precedent for use in other cases by which the inferiority of Black people can be more easily argued.

Justice Clarence Thomas, in my opinion. argues from the stand point that "Black Americans are Equal Under The Law". In as much as this is the foundation of most of his rulings when it comes to race he runs awry of the agenda of the tag team of the "NAACP and the ACLU" - the Black Progressive and the White Liberal respectively. In as much as this is the case - Brother Justice Clarence Thomas is dutifully attacked by these Black operatives as they would attack a White Conservative. They routinely tell our community how much he sounds like a "racist White conservative". Never do you hear the same Black bigoted progressives indicate how much they and their own Black authority figures assumed Black inferiority for the sake of obtaining benefit.......just as we hear from the racist White Liberal. There is a far larger contingent of Black operatives doing the latter.

For the racism chaser a person like "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg" is seen as a "friend of Black people" by the Black Progressive Establishment. For me - she and others who think like her are "Black Inferiorists"!! They serve as assailants upon the "Black Cultural Confidence", replacing "systematic racism" with "systematic INFERIORITY" of Black people. A Black person need not experience racism as an INDIVIDUAL. Our race qualifies us for their perpetual class action lawsuit.

The proof that BLACK PEOPLE ARE EQUAL will come when the Black Establishment is OFFENDED by attempt some to "help a middle aged Black man across the street" because they fear that he might not be able to make his way through traffic.


In summary - there is no end point in mind for the Racism Chaser and his counterpart - the White "Black Inferiorist". Their only interest is the aggregation of POWER for progressive causes and for the Democratic Party.

Only the broader Black community can correct this situation.

The Black community must:
  • Make note that despite the domination of the progressive over every one of the institutions that our people have control over - we still suffer with the most basic of our grievances. (ie: quality education, safe streets).
  • Be mindful of the hate and bigotry that certain operatives who purport to be working on our behalf are smitten with and refuse to be used in their 'racial football game" between the conservative and liberals - just as the great Malcolm X had pointed out more than 45 years ago. Sadly there are more Blacks playing in this game today than Malcolm X could have ever imagined during his day
  • Reject "Assumed Black Inferiority" as a bargaining chip. The short term gain received is not worth the cultural and psychological damage that ensues among our people.
  • Switch to a "MANAGEMENT TOWARD EFFECTIVENESS" strategy where a "'What have you done for me lately' with respect to my permanent interests?" is the operating principals that dictate our community's support.

2 comments:

Atlanta Attractions said...

"The rest of us remain puzzled as to why they don't express such lust when it comes to ignorance" ... you're very right

Holly J said...

Crap- this is heavy and I could not agree with you more. I wish more people spoke out against this. If we are to ever end racism, we need to stop stereotyping ALL people, and seeing people as individuals and not members of a group.