Field Negro's Flock: Those Who Disagree Are Stupid And Are Voting Against Their Own Best Interests

Field-Negro Blog Brought To You By Afro-Spear

Here is proof that despite living in the same nation we in fact live in two different worlds.

The charges levied by the "Field Negro Flock" is that:

1. Those who don't support the incremental attempts by the Federal Democrats to take over the health care system are - "Voting Against Their Own Best Interests"
2. The Republican Party incubates stupid people

When I read these type of charges the first thing I do is to note the irony that is present among those who are making these charges.

My friend Filled-Negro blogs from Metro Philadelphia. I assume that a good portion of his flock reside in other large, progressive controlled cities - especially in the Northeastern states.

The key point that gets me is that they call those who disagree with them "stupid" yet so many of them live in cities that have failing public school systems. I posted a few weeks ago the insult that is present amongst the "Social Promotions" policy that was recently in place within the City of Philadephia's public schools. These big city school systems are not presently pumping out a large quantity of "genius". Instead most of them are hemorrhaging in dysfunction per the "dysfunction" that walks through their front doors each school day.

INCUMBENCY

What is clear among many Black Quasi-Socialist Progressive-Fundamentalist Racism Chasers is that they have no concept about the consequences that they suffer from the forces that THEY PROMOTED INTO POWER over the places where they are the primary determining factor of their representation.

If you allowed them to exclusively paint the narrative about the sources of their grievances about where they live you can be sure that they would mention NOTHING about the consequences of the policies that they now swim in. To many of these "progressive-fundamentalists" their line of reasoning that lead them to their policy preferences is as natural as the water that fish swim in. They will not admit to any particular thought that there are indeed some failures inherent to their ideology. After all there are few within them that will stand back and make note of the INCUMBENCY of their ideology over the key institutions in their local area.

I still struggle to understand how after taking control over their cities, counties and not regions of the nation and STILL experiencing economic erosion, anemic academic results, self-inflicted heath risks stemming from the social order that they have promoted and violence that is akin to that which prompted them to initiate the 'Civil Rights Movement' in the first place that they remain undaunted in their quest to drive their ideology further down the throats of people in a larger land mass.

Thus it is strange that these same people would wonder why more people are not supportive of THEIR plans for the federal government incrementally take over the health care system for the nation.

For them there remains some disconnection as to the results of their ideas once implemented. One of the drivers for the need for nationalized health care has been he destruction of the local economic base in the areas that they now dominate. The distributed economic model where wealth is generated at the periphery and the resulting resources are used to determine the standard of living for the people living within the system has run aground in their world. Despite "winning the elections" and having their policies implemented, in truth, THEY have been 'voting against their own best interests'. These former employment centers that were built up from the presence of industry which managed to employ the masses are now aggregation points of political power and demands upon the central government for redistributed resources as they seek to maintain the standard of living that their present productivity cannot support. Again - "the won the election but lost the war". Their victory in this war on behalf of organized labor was going to have each person's hard work translate into economic security and quality health care services.

Now that they stand on the top of the hill that they have taken via attrition - THEY HAVE NEITHER.

Why is it not legitimate for those who are intellectually curious to make note of the fate of General Motors and the city of Detroit as their ideology slowly took control over both of these once great entities? Note that at the time that these large manufacturing firms were "exploiting their workers" and thus organized labor struggled to obtain a bigger slice of the pie, Detroit and other large metro areas in the Northeast experienced their most exponential growth rates to date. As the regulatory and confiscation regime put forth by the American left took hold the life blood of these entities was drained.

Today these once great cities continue to have their GOVERNMENTS and potentially their UNIONS. The missing element from their greatness, however, and the one which was the target of angst of these other two - the CORPORATIONS - have largely vacated these same places.

At some point the preponderance of evidence should be sufficient for one to take a step back from the theories that feel most comfortable to them and instead begin to ask QUESTIONS.
For the Progressive-Fundamentalist, however, such a situation simply has him to SCALE HIS FOCUS. Instead of going on the "inside" and do a postmortem on how his taking of the plateau where he now stands went so terribly wrong he instead shifts his focus. They choose to "go OUTSIDE", looking for the next plateau to expand their scope to.

You see, they survive off of motion (struggle) as a means of retaining unity among the people. The actual attainment of their stated goals via managing the land that they now control is not a primary goal of theirs. In order to take this disposition they would have to show more "conservative" principles. This is because for them to actually express a certain standard within a political boundary they would need to project some measure of credibility of their policy and agenda.