Why The Distinction Between White Racist Killers and Black Domestic Pirate Killers of Blacks? Its About POWER, Mr. Dreads

In a recent exchange between The Palmetto States' finest , a frequent debate adversary named Nottydreads regarding what essentially boils down to the question of "Why is the White Conservative considered 'open season' for any hate-filled attack without the threat of retaliation against those who make such comments?".

Here is the text of our exchange:

Constructive Feedback, The Cultural Strategist: "I can think of NO WHITE CONSERVATIVE who would avoid damnation for saying that he hoped that a Black public figure dies of kidney failure."

Mr Dreads replied: "You are correct. They've historically leaned toward bullets and rope."

My reply to Mr Dreads' comment: Being that these "White Racists" STILL LIVE amongst us but seemingly have been put in check with the present order of law enforcement that would punish them for their actions...........what say you about the present most popular MURDERERS OF BLACKS? The "Domestic Pirate Thugs"?

What specific characteristic do they possess (or lack) that allows them to commit continuing MURDER AND MAYHEM against Black victims but never have their actions rate as high in your mind as you treat the White Supremacists who killed us in the past?

Properly Framing The Argument Of Mr Dreads

Let's ignore Mr. Dreads' violation of the principles of "Racial Profiling" which attempts to transfer present guilt to the subject at hand for the past actions of others who look like him for just a brief second so that we can debate upon a more important issue. (Seemingly Mr Dreads buys into the notion that as a Black man "he can't be RACIST" since he HAS NO POWER over White people to harm them with his words )

As I stepped away from the computer to finish up my last bit of yard work the words of Mr Dreads and other operatives in his cabal raced through my mind. I tried to understand WHY the "offensive words" said by White people and the murder Blacks by Whites proved so much more "offensive" and "murderous" than when a Black man does the same thing to our people? EQUAL ACTIONS/ EQUAL RESULTS, Differentiated Responses.

Clearly there are no medical differences in the "death" that either assailant renders. No etymological distinctions can be found by the offensive words as said between the two people of the two races.

The response is WHOLLY incumbent upon the assumptions of each of the initiators of the homicide or hate ignorant words as controlled by the OBSERVER.

In my deliberation of the arguments made by Mr Dreads I was able to arrive at a more clear point of understanding about the antics of Mr Dreads and others by appended his tactics to that which I have observed previously. From this I believe that I hit upon a "unifying theory" which motivated me to write this entry. (I am actually hoping that some researcher on "What Happened To Black Folks After They Achieved Their Freedom" will happen upon my documentation and factor them in for a greater understanding of the present day)

Let's be clear – Despite the dramatics that might indicate otherwise – the Black community is not consumed with the murder of ONE Black person. This event happens each and every day in most of the large urban centers around America where our people are in our highest concentrations. The mere death of ONE Black man in and of itself does not provoke the Black community toward protest. Indeed there needs to be some "exploitable surface", where a more interesting target of interest is involved to bring out the protests. Then the Black murder victim can be used as a virtual martyr in this larger context. If you get killed by an "ordinary Black" then you are "just another Negro that got your self kilt". These targets of higher value are, in a representative sample: the Police, a White property owner who shot first and asked questions later as he saw 2 Black males robbing his neighbor's house or even a president that is unfavorable to them that sends their young men off to a war that they don't like.

The sad truth is that the Black Establishment is NOT interested in addressing the fundamental problems that plague the Black community. They are interested in amplifying issues that play well to their strengths: Portraying Black Folks as HISTORY'S VICTIM and that nothing has changed in race relations in this nation and thus THIS explains the reason why Black folks are always "Sub 1.0" on the National Urban League "State Of Black America Report" as compared to White folks registering as 1.0. If the Black Establishment were interested in correction within the community they would acknowledge that they ALREADY have control every single voting district in which Black people are 35%+ of the voting base. There only needs to be 15% + 1 of White Democrats in the district to make this a Democratic district. They have favorable people controlling ALL OF THE INSTITUTIONS within these places. Despite this fact they always reference some external force that is stifling them from delivering upon their promises. Thus they are able to escape damnation by having the masses shift from their scrutiny over those controlling these institutions over to this external target that can UNIFY "the Blacks".

INSTEAD of producing "A Fix", the Black Establishment Power, working in conjunction with the Democratic Political Machine are all about POWER AGGREGATION!!!

They want control and dominance of their party and their Progressive Ideology, having it control all of the institutions within and trampling all competing ideologies. Even when the working class people are being failed, they are made to believe as their PARTY and IDEOLOGY gains power that THEY as individuals are gaining power.

I have already articulated why PROGRESSIVISM IS NOT AN 'ORGANIC IDEOLOGY'. It doesn't seek to cordon off a district and apply "progressive theories" upon this one plot of land; managing it to show thyself approved; and then expanding this franchise elsewhere for other areas to benefit from the previous success that they've delivered.

Instead it is on the constant "end around". It needs to expand and control all of the variables of a nation before it can satisfy itself that its job is complete. When the boundaries of one plateau is met and they risk being held accountable as the prevailing order, you can be sure that a new EXPANSION EFFORT will soon come in order to keep the masses focused on PROGRESSION rather than DELIVERY OF PROMISES. This is why, despite the fact that every single sizable metropolis in the Northeast of the United States is as BLUE as they come, the economic and academic condition of the people within and the question of the public safety under their tutelage is not enough to cause this ideology to come under scrutiny by those who are among its most ardent followers. They hate the establishment conservatives and corporations more than they care to make note of how much control their machine has over the institutions that impact their lives on a daily basis.

The South's ideological dominance comes from the "racism" of those who are entrenched.

The North's ideological dominance comes from the "enlightenment" of those who have chosen the wise way forward. (This must be why the South is receiving a net inflow of Northerners who have also "seen the light" - like me.)

PUTTING IT TOGETHER – THE SYNERGY

Thus as I was caring for my lawn and thought about the POWER GRAB lead by the progressive – I made the observation that the reason why:

• Wanda Sykes the comedian cannot produce 'hateful words' against White Conservatives" enough to MATERIALLY HURT THEM. Despite wishing for the death by kidney failure of one of their popular figures, a jab whic would not be tolerable if a White Conservative said the same thing against a Black public figure
  
• "Domestic Pirate On Black Killings" are not viewed in the same way as are "White on Black killings" or "Police on Black killings". You have a hungry inferior striking out against a peer or a higher authority with the actions of the Domestic Pirates.
  

The synergizing theory is that of the POWER RELATIONSHIP between the two forces in question!!!!

(perceived or true power imbalance)

The Domestic Pirate who kills a Black person on the street is seen to have no POWER. He is living a life of desperation. Thus since SOCIETY MADE HIM HUNGRY, the fact that he is striking out as such is the fault of SOCIETY, not his own making. We must take over the distribution of all economic resources so that he won't get a raw deal by this racist society and thus he won't have to resort to the gun to free up some cheddar.

Likewise Wanda Sykes benefits from the same inferiority that is hoisted upon any two bit hip hop artist. Despite the fact that some of them speak the most vile, hateful and racist commentary AND having White folks as their main consumers of this product, the veil of POWERLESSNESS protects all of their COMMERCIAL SPEECH as if they had their own little ACLU lawyer waiting in their hip pocket. Instead the ubiquitous "White Entertainment Executive" who green lighted these words from "The Black" should be held accountable. After all HE is in a position of AUTHORITY while "The Black" is just doing what is necessary to grab some Benjamins.

In the case of Ms Sykes – Rush Limbaugh represents POWER..... WHITE POWER. He represents the POWER to derail the PROGRESSIVE HEGEMONY that is fomenting within this country. In as much as the "White House Correspondent's Dinner" was an opportunity to skewer the Republicans and Rush Limbaugh their hides were not off limits, regardless of any past limits that had existed regarding the line that should not be crossed at this official event.

I have no interest in picking apart this one night because it is in line with what I have previously called out about the agenda of the White Liberal: "Put a Black Man who is handicapped and wears glasses" in as the ball carrier as a means of making sure that all who attack him as they call out what he is doing will themselves be attacked as RACISTS for hitting a Black guy who is handicapped and wearing glasses. Instead we must talk about POWER RELATIONSHIPS that are represented by these unusual times here in America.

Even the authority of being in the audience with the PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the most powerful man in the world, did not afford Wanda Sykes the same standing of a WHITE CONSERVATIVE MALE. If he said the same hate-filled comments against an adversary at such a function there would be "Klan Gathering" references syndiacated upon every AfroSpear blog today.

You see as their calculus works, President Barack Obama is BLACK. Thus all of the inferiority of Black people…..per the view of the White Liberal and the BQPFRC come along with his package. The entire personna of the BQPFRCs who is willing to kneel down in the pretext of accepting some benefit is brought along with him as a Black man in the office. Obama is not INFERIOR. Obama race is preventing him from receiving a sustained attack becuase those who attack him will be called a RACIST in his motivations.

At the end of it all – this is all about "Smash Mouth POWER". This machine is going to use any tactic that is can muster to achieve its goal of POWER AGGREGATION.

The only hope is for those who have BLACK CONSCIOUSNESS and who seek to defend against this power grab is to enumerate the damage to the Black community that awaits us if this force is not balanced out with reason.

The fact is that despite their control over where we live in our highest concentrations their power has not translated into Quality Schools, Safe Streets, Thriving Local Economies and Healthy Life Styles for Black people. The continued stance of the inferiority of Black people has a measurable negative impact upon our people. In the New Haven Fire Department when an otherwise agreeable plan for evaluation and promotion of qualified individuals is thrown out because there were not enough Black people contained in the pool of awardees, the cry on behalf of DIVERSITY does little more than advance the notion of BLACK INFERIORITY, absent some "special treatment" for Blacks. Those Whites (and one Hispanic) who were awarded the lieutenant's position when the thumb of "diversity" was not put upon the scale will always realize that but for this thumb they would be in the commanding position.

Some Blacks rationalize that the historical thumb of "White Racism" that poked their ancestors in the eye is a worthy consideration for the use of this enhancement on behalf of their cause, even when there is no proof of RACISM in the current context of New Haven. Thus they achieve a state of "transferred inferiorization" from one generation of Blacks to the other. They are content with this in the context of them receiving a benefit for lowering their shoulders and head.

They would resent anyone who dares note their inferiority ABSENT the pretext of extending some benefit. Please note the "Affirmative Action Bake Sale" of a few years ago which made note of such racial discounting but not as the basis of extending benefit to the undervalued races. The people who put on these displays were subjected to attack despite the fact that they, in essence, made the very same argument that the Racism Chasers did regarding their relative inferiority.

Thus the way forward for Black America is clear.

There needs to be a measure of RACIAL DIGNITY put forth in which our people ORGANICALLY promote ourselves as equal to White people. The lost of one position is not worth the loss of your entire dignity as an equal human being!!

• A Black life is valuable and thus anyone who kills us, REGARDLESS of their own racial origin will be treated equally
  
• The Permanent Interests of the Black Community are sacrosanct. We will not allow our will to have "Democrats" and an "Increased Black Head Count" in elected positions to violate these permanent interests. Instead of "Republican vs "Democrat" the debate is between "Is It Working or is it Not working?" and thus we act accordingly against anyone who violates these interests.
  
• We realize that we are fighting for ABSOLUTE civil rights and standards of behavior when it comes to racially sensitive issues. Since we are the one's who condemned White people for using their race to escape accountability as they operated with impunity, we will never allow a Black person to similarly use their race to violate any of these terms. Failure to do this only means that the White racist was not absolutely wrong…..he just exploited a POWER IMBALANCE before the Black community could establish a similar imbalance and a biased jury who must act upon such violations.