The Gas ChamberJustice Talking Audio - The Death PenaltyThis weekend's "Justice Talking" program on NPR was very interesting. The subject this week was the politics and race of the "Death Penalty". As usual for the program - the reporting was slanted left.
In the spirit of my 2007 Filter called "Proportionality" I would like the various advocates against the Death Penalty to justify their focus and priorities as compared to the UNSOLVED HOMICIDES within the Black community today. People tell me that everything does not break down into "right and left" in this world. Unfortunately many of the greatest problems WITHIN the Black community are a function of the agenda that is propelled by the left and the related issues that they choose to ignore.
In 2006 more than 7,000 Black people were murdered in this country according to the US Department of Justice. In many Black communities the closure rate for these same homicides is as low as 32%. With 68% of killers of Black people walking the streets and the FAMILIES OF THE VICTIMS left high and dry seeking justice......where do the Anti-Death Penalty Advocates stand regarding this NON-justice? The national average for unsolved murders is 49%. As a working estimate 3,450 Black people in the year 2006 were killed and their killers continue walk free of prosecution.
The death row population for all states and the Federal Government/Military is 3,350.
(Death Row Stats) This is an AGGREGATE number. The 3,450 figure represents an ACCUMULATIVE number, as each year goes by more "cold case" figures are added to the pile......more Black families having buried their loved ones are told by the people who should be advocating for their case to "Get Over It. He's DEAD. If the killer were a different color or if he was a cop - we would take up your case". (If only my dramatics in this quote were NOT TRUE - then you would have something to criticize me about.)
I must credit the activist community. When it comes to holding the Government accountable you had better not get in their way. They will burn the midnight oil looking for loopholes to allow a convicted killer out of jail. Clearly they have reversed the convictions of INNOCENT MEN and gotten them released from jail and they should be commended for this. They have made sure that 'justice has been served'.
Where they need to be thoroughly criticized, however, is where the big glaring hole in their ideological tendencies resides - ADVOCATING FOR THE PUNISHMENT OF THE GUILTY INDIVIDUAL WHO DID NOT COME FROM A GILDED BACKGROUND! AND FIGHTING TO EXPRESS THE VALUE OF THE BLACK PERSON WHO WAS KILLED BY ANOTHER BLACK PERSON BY PURSUING KILLERS, REGARDLESS OF THEIR COLOR.
In my view the NON-JUSTICE that is growing within the Black community is not only the "photographic negative" of the fight for release of the innocent.....it is a LARGER problem from a PROPORTIONAL standpoint as the statistics clearly show. Once again the cherry picking must stop! It is literally KILLING US!
This point must be thoroughly examined. For a group that fights so passionately for the JUSTICE of those who have been FALSELY accused of crimes (and thus they are VICTIMS of the system).....where is their passion to fight on behalf of the families of the VICTIMS who otherwise are left hanging? Is the only fight that the so called Advocates for Justice have a FIGHT FOR JUSTICE only reserved to fighting AGAINST THE SYSTEM?
It seems to me that there are 4 players involved in the successful expression of justice: The Government (police, DA, court system, prison system) which enforce the will of the state; the criminal defense which work on behalf of the accused; the advocacy community which works to ensure fairness; and frequently overlooked force called THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE. The last component is a vital link to tying up these loose ends. Their unwillingness to work with the investigators benefits the killers. Either through loyalty or intimidation the longer they are silent the longer justice is denied the victim. The activist community is expert at attacking the first group - the system. It has yet to form the proper disposition with the community to effectuate a higher closure rate. They are used to pandering on behalf of this same community to pound the system - the police or the court system.......when it is time to get the community to stand up and EXPRESS THE VALUE OF THE BLACK VICTIM - they are woefully short. As long as the devaluation is a function of the System they are viewed as strong - rather than SELECTIVE as is the real case.
In my recent expose' on US Congressman John Lewis' fight to reopen the "Cold Case Civil Rights" murders all the while blood ran on the streets of the Vine City section of his district - a second angle of this peculiar conflict was brought to light. Where as Lewis, a liberal, this time expresses the will to go after INDIVIDUALS rather than just a "government system" - it is clear that this assailant must be WHITE for there to be any particular gusto motiving the inexhaustible pursuit of the killer of a Black man. In my response to a radio interview on the proposal the radio host responded to me that "there are 'crimes' and then there are 'CRIMES'". (What he Translation: The individual WHITE MAN killing of a Black man during the 40's, 50's and 60's are far more valuable than the day to dao killings of Black people BY A BLACK PERSON. This is an example of "Non-White White Supremacy" as the ASSAILANT determines the value of the act which caused the death of the Black victim.
Interestingly enough earlier this year Rep. Lewis was seen on television testifying on behalf of a convicted killer of a police officer from Savannah. Again we see a switch and a cherry picking episode. Mr. Lewis has taken up the case to FREE a Black man who is in the last phases of the Death Penalty process. NEVER did Mr. Lewis announce a plan to find the REAL KILLER of the off-duty Savannah police officer who was working a second job, providing security to make ends meet for his family. Where as in the Mumia Abu Jamal case the CLAIM is made that the dead officer was a part of a system that has long oppressed Blacks and thus it was self defense, no such claims were made about the killing of the Savannah police officer as a defense for the accused killer. These type of cases are the heart of the lack of consistency that strip off the credibility of those who to CLAIM to be in the pursuit of JUSTICE.
From a PROPORTIONALITY stand point applied to history - a little over 5,000 Blacks were lynched by Whites from Reconstruction to the end of the Civil Rights Movement. As a comparison last year 7,000 Black people were murdered in the United States. This is the primary reason why the filter of PROPORTIONALITY must be applied to the various attempt to draw upon our emotions by certain operatives. They would have you to adopt THEIR agenda while the Black community remains in fear from the thugs today who are invading our homes and keeping us terrorized.
During the radio segment from Justice Talking I found the comments made by Bryan Stevenson, executive director of the Equal Justice Initiative of Alabama to be quite interesting.
During the interview he states:
The key problem in Alabama is that elected judges have the power to update a jury verdict of "Life In Prison" to Death Penalty. I notice that he does not bother to talk about the fundamental question of guilt or innocence of the person who was convicted of the crime but sentenced to life. He only talks about the sentence of death that was rendered by the judge - insinuating politically motivated interference with the wishes of the jury. He is DEFINITELY not considering the NOW DEAD VICTIM of the crime. As with Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall he seems to be opposed to the death penalty anytime, any circumstance. A position I thoroughly reject. I don't understand how their fervent opposition to state rendered death has them so unable to address the ultimate death penalty - the one that is rendered on the streets - where one man is the judge, jury and executioner. They seem to work on his behalf rather than the now dead victim - who's killer is of the wrong group.
Alabama does not have a Public Defender System - I agree that this must change. I support the state funding of a system that provides adequate legal representation for the defendant. If the government is poised to take the life of an individual he should have legal representation to allow a full consideration of all of the facts to be brought to light. I would love to see a tax placed on large punitive rewards from around the state to be used to fund the Public Defender system. Unfortunately this will be a non-starter for the Trial Lawyers, John Edwards included.
I would be remiss, however,if I failed to make note of the current situation with the "Court House Shooter", Brian Nichols in Georgia. Where as his guilt is certain - the public defender has thus far spent over A MILLION DOLLARS to defend him. Cross reference this with the fact that because of this one big case consuming so much budget for this department - the Public Defender's office was forced to lay off workers and thus IMPACT THE REPRESENTATION OF OTHER PEOPLE who's guilt is at play. This is a perversion of justice as a man who is clearly guilty of killing 4 people (and who should have been shot dead that day of his escapades) is able to suck the funding for justice out of so man other individuals. If there is one man who NEEDS TO BE represented by a shoddy defense lawyer - it is Bryan Nichols.
White Murder Victims - Greatest Predictor Of Who Gets Death
80% of people on death row and executed are for victims who are White despite the fact that African Americans are more than 2/3 of all murder victimsThis is an interesting spin that Mr. Stevenson puts upon the situation. He drops the statistics about the number of Black murder victims (2/3rd) but does not talk about the NON-JUSTICE issue that I bring up above. You would THINK that Mr. Stevenson is a pro law and order type of guy based on this pronouncement. You would be mistaken.
Instead he is only selectively promoting the fact that the "WHITE HOMICIDE VICTIM" is the crown jewel of the Capital Punishment game. This must be matched against the fact that among the BLACK OPERATIVES......the WHITE killer of Black people hold special status than the BLACK killer as well. (There goes that "photographic negative" again that always gets me in trouble. Some Black operatives like to play the "White Supremacy" card. They don't like being shown that THEY ARE "Non-White White Supremacists" as they promote the very same thing in their reactions only from the other direction. The White victim is king for the White folks and the White assailant is king for the Black folks. (Stepping on too many toes now - I had better move on)
Jury selection in a majority Black county - a mostly white jury is chosen. This is called "bigotry" by Mr. StevensonSome comments are dependent upon the IGNORANCE of the listener to the FACTS. The fact of the matter is that Black communities around the nation have a problem with BLACK PEOPLE responding to JURY SUMMONS. In Fulton County Georgia just last month a judge went after several people who had blown off their summons. According to the images that I saw - in this county with a sizable Black population - the majority of the people hauled in before the judge for this offense - WERE BLACK. I understand the tendency to PLAY THE VICTIM but in the case of those who argue about INJUSTICE due to "the non-sympathetic White jurors"......when THEY don't show up to court to do their civic duty - THERE IS NO EXCUSE. They squandered their opportunity to have a different set of eyes and brains to analyze the facts and render judgment.
Ditto this with a judge in DC who, this past summer in seeing that an all-White jury was seated in a capital murder case and disposed of the impaneled jury and sought out another - THIS TOO was NOT because of racist prosecutors dismissing Black jury candidates using their peremptory challenges. It was because there were not enough of us RESPONDING TO THE SUMMONS! Why are people quick to claim racism but loathed to talk about the consequences of the choices of Black people?
I final interesting use of the stereotypes which has the prosecutor avoiding Black jurors while defense attorneys favoring them can be found in the recent plea by US Representative William Jefferson. It seems that Mr. Jefferson would rather have his trial moved to Washington DC so that he can receive the benefit of a jury impaneled from a pool of DC residents, more of whom are Black. Why is it that Mr. Jefferson is allowed to play on the stereotype of the liberal Black jury member to favor his acquittal but a DA in Texas who noticed the same thing and avoided seating Blacks is said to be racist and served as the grounds of a Supreme Court review of a capital case? Worst of all - where are the USUAL SUSPECTS in attacking Mr. Jefferson's contribution to this stereotype?
Unfortunately we as Black people have been conditioned to be CONSUMERS. We can articulate what others must do to provide JUSTICE to us and we surly know how to attack the system when it fails us. What is the response to the Black citizen who fails to do his part in sitting on the jury? I assure you we are more likely to hear criticism of the Fulton County judge who issued fines for those who failed to show up than to hear criticism about the failure of the people to do their civic duties.
Living in the shadow of ApartheidI am not going to lie - this portion of Mr. Stevenson's rhetoric pissed me off. In considering the fact that the average Black person is KILLED by another Black person and that the unsolved killings of Black people statistically have a Black man as the killer - for this man to evoke comparisons to Apartheid was unseemly at best. His narrative is dependent upon an OPPRESSIVE WHITE MAN bearing down upon Black people, throwing us in jail as a means of making their quota in the "Prison Industrial Complex". No where does this man make note of the BLACK PEOPLE who contribute to the 2/3's rate of KILLING of Black people in the state of Alabama. If these were klansmen killing Black people with reckless abandon I would be right there with him. I refuse to believe that a young Black kid born in 1985 and who later kills someone in 2007 is a victim of the vestiges of "American Apartheid".
The Black Racism Chaser must find a way to mix his advocacy for JUSTICE for Black people with the PAINFUL REALITIES that are on the streets today - Black people are KILLING BLACK PEOPLE in the greatest numbers.
It is nothing short of perversion to advocate for the release of an innocent man in the spirit of the pursuit of JUSTICE while you look past the larger stack of cases in which a VICTIM of a real killers actions is left to remain hanging - the SPIRIT and the PERSON of his killer left free to "Walk the Earth" as a Free Man!!!Can we at least start out from the square one fact - SOMEBODY KILLED the now dead person. Pursuing technicalities in the system as a means of springing a person does not also mean that you are looking to find the REAL KILLER. As it stands right now - having sprung a 'wrongfully convicted killer' - their job is DONE. They have been successful at what they set out to do. Nothing is said about "the real killer" if he exists outside of the person of interest to the advocates.
A certain ideology is expert at fighting against an outside force. They are equally inept at bringing forth a desired set of outcomes when this outside force is not the main antagonist and they are forced to deal with the INTERNAL TERMITES that are eating the hell out of the Black community today.
Ultimately it is the BLACK COMMUNITY'S fault for allowing these operatives to play us so. The pursuit of justice must sometimes force us to look "within" and not just "without".